[T10] Comment on 22-106r0
Ralph.Weber at wdc.com
Fri Oct 28 08:37:16 PDT 2022
How I overlooked 188.8.131.52 befuddles me even now, however.
Based on the presence of the necessary information in 184.108.40.206, I will ask that 22-106r0 be withdrawn as one of the CAP Ad Hoc activities in November.
All the best,
From: t10-bounces at t10.org <t10-bounces at t10.org> On Behalf Of Gerry Houlder
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 1:10 PM
To: T10 Reflector <t10 at t10.org>
Subject: [T10] Comment on 22-106r0
I am OK with what you are proposing for this, but it is already required in the model for storage element depopulation (clause 220.127.116.11). There is a similar requirement in 18.104.22.168 for storage element restoration requirements.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the T10