[T10] Errors discovered in SPC-6, probably same error in SPC-5

Ralph Weber Ralph.Weber at wdc.com
Fri Sep 25 18:02:46 PDT 2020


The Command Duration Limits log page is not defined in SPC-5 (see table 320 in http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=spc5r22.pdf).

Therefore, the presence of an error in SPC-6 does not constitute a need to modify/correct SPC-5. Clearly, any substantive errors found in SPC-6 ought to be corrected by change proposals written against SPC-6. This should not be a difficult problem because the RFC ballot on SPC-6 is not planned to commence until ~15 months from now.

All the best, .Ralph

From: t10-bounces at t10.org <t10-bounces at t10.org> On Behalf Of Gerry Houlder
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 5:26 PM
To: T10 Reflector <t10 at t10.org>
Subject: [T10] Errors discovered in SPC-6, probably same error in SPC-5

In SPC-6, while looking at the Command Duration Limits log page I notice that table 349 - Command Duration Limits log parameter indicates that the parameter code for these parameters is 0001h. This is incorrect. From table 346, the parameter number should range from 0011h to 0017h and from 0021h to 0027h.

Is it still possible to get this fixed in the second letter ballot version of SPC-5 (if it isn't already)?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.t10.org/pipermail/t10/attachments/20200926/3044da75/attachment.html>


More information about the T10 mailing list