[T10] Two late RFC comments regarding SBC-4 r17

Ralph Weber Ralph.Weber at wdc.com
Fri Aug 2 06:25:29 PDT 2019


Comment 1 (editorial)

In 4.19.3.3 and 4.19.3.5, there are four instances of third level a) entries with no b). These are not lists in a state machine, so unless there is a justification for these single-entry lists, the third level a)'s should be removed.

Comment 2 (substantive)

In 4.19.3.2, the use an ordered list prevents 4) from ever being processed because 3) requires command termination.

All the best,

.Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.t10.org/pipermail/t10/attachments/20190802/30831273/attachment.html>


More information about the T10 mailing list