VERIFY (10) -- BYTCHK == 10b

[Gerry Houlder]

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1402244_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Why shouldn't that bit combination be treated as reserved? The field was
created relatively recently and no one has identified a use for that
combination, vendor specific or otherwise.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Penokie, George
<George.Penokie at lsi.com>wrote:
>  Ralph,
>
>
>
> Yes, except that is unusual to call something the application does as
> vendor specific.
>
>
>
> Bye for now,
>
> George Penokie
>
>
>
> LSI Corporation
>
> 3033 41 St NW
>
> Rochester , MN 55901
>
>
>
> 507-328-9017
>
> george.penokie at lsi.com
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] *On Behalf Of *Ralph
> Weber
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2014 11:36 AM
> *To:* t10 at t10.org
>
> *Subject:* RE: VERIFY (10) -- BYTCHK == 10b
>
>
>
> George,
>
> Given the absence of any other mention of BYTCHK==10b in the applicable
> subclause, the proposed wording appears to have the net effect of making
> the definition of BYTCHK codepoint 10b vendor specific.
>
> Is that your intent?
>
> All the best,
>
> .Ralph
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Penokie, George [George.Penokie at lsi.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2014 11:23 AM
> *To:* Ralph Weber; t10 at t10.org
> *Subject:* RE: VERIFY (10) -- BYTCHK == 10b
>
> Ralph,
>
>
>
> As this table is a description of what the application client is placing
> in the Data-Out buffer for the various values in the BYTCHK field, I would
> consider saying for code 10b:
>
>
>
> Application specific logical block data that is outside the scope of this
> standard
>
>
>
> Bye for now,
>
> George Penokie
>
>
>
> LSI Corporation
>
> 3033 41 St NW
>
> Rochester , MN 55901
>
>
>
> 507-328-9017
>
> george.penokie at lsi.com
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org <owner-t10 at t10.org>]
*On
> Behalf Of *Ralph Weber
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2014 10:45 AM
> *To:* t10 at t10.org
> *Subject:* VERIFY (10) -- BYTCHK == 10b
>
>
>
> In SBC-3 r36, does the use of "Not Defined" in table 98 equate to
> "Reserved", or is it more like "Vendor Specific" (i.e., "outside the scope
> of this standard")?
>
> I ask because table 98 is the only statement I can find in the description
> of the VERIFY (10) command that any any way discusses the meaning of the
> 10b codepoint for BYTCHK.
>
> All the best,
>
> .Ralph
>