spl3r02: Logical SAS Phy

Penokie, George George.Penokie at lsi.com
Mon Apr 15 07:58:00 PDT 2013

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Penokie, George" <George.Penokie at lsi.com>
Thanks for pointing this out.
I looks like the proposal (07-094) that created that UML section reversed the
logical and the phy terms. All of the Logical SAS Phy terms should have been
SAS Logical Phy. The same is true for the Logical Expander Phy which should
have been Expander Logical Phy.
I consider this an editorial error and will fix it in the next revision of
SPL-3 unless someone objects. 
Bye for now,
George Penokie
LSI Corporation
3033 41 St NW
Rochester , MN 55901
george.penokie at lsi.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Breher [mailto:joe at lingua-data.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:21 AM
To: Penokie, George
Subject: spl3r02: Logcal SAS Phy
Hi George -
I am working my way through spl3r02 for a new design. I ran across something
that seems confusing to me. Is there a difference between a SAS Logical Phy
and a Logical SAS Phy?
Thanks -
Joe Breher
lingua data (a dba of q music inc)
(478) 2-Breher
(478) 227-3437
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org

More information about the T10 mailing list