REPLACE LOST RESERVATION fixes uploaded ... again ... maybe for the last time
roweber at ieee.org
Tue Jul 24 14:54:24 PDT 2012
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
I am reasonably certain that there is a preference for successfully
processing the REPLACE LOST RESERVATION. With this in mind, I am
willing to consider the requested change, but only if the list
switches from unordered to ordered.
All the best,
On 7/24/2012 4:50 PM, Penokie, George wrote:
> I have looked it over. The only suggestion I have would be to change item
b) in the second a,b list from:
> b) prior to the successful processing of a PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT command
with the REPLACE LOST RESERVATION service action, the recoverable lost
persistent reservation becomes unrecoverable.
> b) the recoverable lost persistent reservation becoming unrecoverable.
> As it really matter when the reservation becomes unrecoverable. And once
the Replace Lost Reservation occurs the a,b list instance is no longer in
> Bye for now,
> George Penokie
> LSI Corporation
> 3033 41 St NW
> Rochester , MN 55901
> george.penokie at lsi.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Weber
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:18 PM
> To: 't10 at t10.org'
> Subject: REPLACE LOST RESERVATION fixes uploaded ... again ... maybe for
the last time
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
> * Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
> Based on the comments received during today's conference call,
> I have posted a new revision of the proposal that fixes the
> REPLACE LOST RESERVATION model.
> All those present on the call were satisfied with the gist of
> the changes (if not the details too), but several participants
> wanted a reasonable interval to review the final product before
> incorporation in SPC-4.
> With this in mind, my plan for making progress is as follows:
> 1) SPC-4 r36c will not include changes from 12-270; however
> 2) the changes will be incorporated in r36d unless significant
> .. complaints are received before Friday 3 August.
> This will give the 6 August call announced by George Penokie the
> best possible chance to inspect the REPLACE LOST RESERVATION total
> package in the posted SPC-4 r36d PDF file.
> All the best,
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10