REPLACE LOST RESERVATION fixes uploaded ... again ... maybe for the last time

Ralph Weber roweber at ieee.org
Tue Jul 24 14:18:24 PDT 2012


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
Based on the comments received during today's conference call,
I have posted a new revision of the proposal that fixes the
REPLACE LOST RESERVATION model.
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-270r3.pdf
All those present on the call were satisfied with the gist of
the changes (if not the details too), but several participants
wanted a reasonable interval to review the final product before
incorporation in SPC-4.
With this in mind, my plan for making progress is as follows:
1) SPC-4 r36c will not include changes from 12-270; however
2) the changes will be incorporated in r36d unless significant
.. complaints are received before Friday 3 August.
This will give the 6 August call announced by George Penokie the
best possible chance to inspect the REPLACE LOST RESERVATION total
package in the posted SPC-4 r36d PDF file.
All the best,
.Ralph
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org



More information about the T10 mailing list