SPC-4 Letter Ballot Responses r0 document is available

[Ralph Weber]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
The initial revision of the SPC-4 Letter Ballot comments response 
document is available:
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-311r0.pdf
Despite what you might expect, the PDF file is definitely the place to 
start. Pages one and two contain instructions, and some summary data 
(and, for the gluttons out there, a link to the FDF file).
For those interested in what CAP needs to discuss on Monday, pages 3--6 
contain my outline of topics. This list is intrinsically a random walk 
through the available comments. If you know of an important comment or 
subject area that is not listed in 12-311r0, do not hesitate to lobby 
for its addition to the list.
Another file of interest might be:
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=spc4r36b.pdf
However (sorry Bill), all roads lead back to 12-311r0.pdf. In this case, 
the main PDF file provides handy hot links into the SPC-4 r36b PDF file. 
Use this Acrobat hack to avoid a nasty slog through all the parts of 
SPC-4 that have not changed ... yet.
One last point needs an explanation. A focus of the effort thus far has 
been bringing the comments I wrote to resolution. In order for the 
letter ballot to begin in June, I was obliged break with tradition and 
write comments. I want to be as upfront about it as possible about this 
quirky turn of events.
Since is nearly impossible for me to write a letter ballot comment 
solely for the purposes of rejecting it, the committee deserves the 
longest possible time to inspect what I have changed in response to my 
own review. This is why the ENDL comments received extraordinary attention.
Have fun preparing for the Monday confab.
All the best,
.Ralph
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org