From lohmeyer at t10.org  Sat Dec  1 23:01:22 2012
From: lohmeyer at t10.org (T10 Document Administrator)
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 00:01:22 -0700
Subject: Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2012/11/25
Message-ID: <mailman.368.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 Document Administrator <lohmeyer at t10.org>
*
Proposals
---------
SPC-4/5: REPORT LUNS new select report types
(by: Frederick Knight, David Black, Murali Rajagopal)
T10/12-124r1   Uploaded: 2012/11/27   222056 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-124r1.pdf
SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
(by: Alvin Cox)
T10/12-363r5   Uploaded: 2012/11/28   283040 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-363r5.pdf
SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
(by: Alvin Cox)
T10/12-363r6   Uploaded: 2012/11/30   214172 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-363r6.pdf
SPC-4: RSOC & RSTMF & PR interactions - late letter ballot comment
(by: Frederick Knight)
T10/12-404r1   Uploaded: 2012/11/30   146768 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-404r1.pdf
SAM-5 Task management function description tweaks
(by: Rob Elliott)
T10/13-004r0   Uploaded: 2012/11/27   142255 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-004r0.pdf
SSC-4: CDP mode page page length (Late LB Comment)
(by: Kevin Butt)
T10/13-005r0   Uploaded: 2012/11/27   22956 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-005r0.pdf
SAS-3: TX Preset Status
(by: Mathieu Gagnon)
T10/13-007r0   Uploaded: 2012/11/28   622603 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-007r0.pdf
Minutes of SAS PHY Working Group conference call November 29, 2012
(by: Alvin Cox)
T10/13-008r0   Uploaded: 2012/11/29   21556 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-008r0.pdf
Working Drafts
--------------
SCSI Block Commands - 3 (SBC-3)
(Editor: Mark Evans)
 Rev: 34       Uploaded: 2012/11/30   2655113 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=sbc3r34.pdf
SCSI Block Commands - 3 (SBC-3)
(Editor: Mark Evans)
 Rev: 34a      Uploaded: 2012/11/30   2427271 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=sbc3r34a.pdf
(Report generated on 2012/12/02 at 00:01:22)
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From curtis.stevens at wdc.com  Mon Dec  3 14:40:33 2012
From: curtis.stevens at wdc.com (Curtis Stevens)
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:40:33 +0000
Subject: SOPQI Letter Ballot Comment Resolution
Message-ID: <mailman.369.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212030_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212030_nameless-3936-3.txt">nameless-3936-3.txt</a>

Date: 17-DEC-2012
Time: 12:30pm PT
PQI Resolutions Only
CURTIS STEVENS invites you to an online meeting using WebEx.
Meeting Number: 743 492 670
Meeting Password: This meeting does not require a password.
-------------------------------------------------------
To join this meeting (Now from mobile devices!)
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to https://premconf.webex.com/premconf/j.php?J=743492670
2. If requested, enter your name and email address.
3. If a password is required, enter the meeting password: This meeting does
not require a password.
4. Click "Join".
5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen.
-------------------------------------------------------
Teleconference information
-------------------------------------------------------
Call-in toll-free number (Premiere): 1-866-546-3377  (US)
Call-in number (Premiere): 1-719-234-7872  (US)
Show global numbers:
https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=9827629443&num=1866-546
-3377&num2=1719-234-7872
Attendee access code: 982 762 9443
http://www.webex.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and
any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to
be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such
recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your concerns
with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do not join the
session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject to discovery in
the event of litigation.


From curtis.stevens at wdc.com  Mon Dec  3 14:43:27 2012
From: curtis.stevens at wdc.com (Curtis Stevens)
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:43:27 +0000
Subject: Canceled: SOPQI Letter Ballot Comment Resolution
Message-ID: <mailman.370.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212031_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212031_nameless-3936-6.txt">nameless-3936-6.txt</a>



From curtis.stevens at wdc.com  Mon Dec  3 14:47:14 2012
From: curtis.stevens at wdc.com (Curtis Stevens)
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:47:14 +0000
Subject: SOPQI Letter Ballot Comment Resolution
Message-ID: <mailman.371.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212032_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212032_nameless-3936-9.txt">nameless-3936-9.txt</a>

Date: 17-DEC-2012
Time: 12:30pm PT
PQI Resolutions Only
Mark Evans will be hosting this meeting.
CURTIS STEVENS invites you to an online meeting using WebEx.
Meeting Number: 749 747 463
Meeting Password: This meeting does not require a password.
-------------------------------------------------------
To join this meeting (Now from mobile devices!)
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to https://premconf.webex.com/premconf/j.php?J=749747463
2. If requested, enter your name and email address.
3. If a password is required, enter the meeting password: This meeting does
not require a password.
4. Click "Join".
5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen.
-------------------------------------------------------
Teleconference information
-------------------------------------------------------
Call-in toll-free number (Premiere): 1-866-546-3377  (US)
Call-in number (Premiere): 1-719-234-7872  (US)
Show global numbers:
https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=9827629443&num=1866-546
-3377&num2=1719-234-7872
Attendee access code: 982 762 9443
http://www.webex.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and
any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to
be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such
recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your concerns
with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do not join the
session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject to discovery in
the event of litigation.


From kdbutt at us.ibm.com  Tue Dec  4 07:59:33 2012
From: kdbutt at us.ibm.com (Kevin D Butt)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:59:33 -0700
Subject: Can we obsolete the READ CONTINUOUS bit
Message-ID: <mailman.372.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212040_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Gerry Houlder wrote "I have the impression that the READ CONTINUOUS bit, 
in the READ WRITE RECOVERY mode page, is not used by anyone.  I think it 
boils down to everyone wanting data that can be trusted, even in video 
applications. Does anyone have an application that justifies keeping this 
feature? "
IBM desires to keep the READ CONTINUOUS bit.
Kevin D. Butt
SCSI & Fibre Channel Architect, Tape Firmware
Data Protection & Retention
MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
Tel: 520-799-5280
Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com


From scsi.bbs at lsi.com  Fri Dec  7 13:49:31 2012
From: scsi.bbs at lsi.com (T10 Voting Administrator)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:49:31 -0700
Subject: SBC-3: T10 Letter Ballot T10LBVOTE 13-013r0
Message-ID: <mailman.373.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 Voting Administrator <scsi.bbs at lsi.com>
*
 2012/12/07 14:48:54
A T10 letter ballot (T10/13-013r0) has just been issued.
If you are a T10 voting member, you should have already received a
separate email with details of how to vote.
If you did not receive this separate email, it is likely that
a spam filter blocked its delivery. You can also find voting
instructions in the Members section of the T10 committee
web site.
The topic of this letter ballot is:
  Forwarding SBC-3 to First Public Review
This ballot closes 2013/01/24 at 12:00 noon MT.
Please do NOT reply to this automated email.
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From Dave.Landsman at sandisk.com  Fri Dec  7 14:59:41 2012
From: Dave.Landsman at sandisk.com (Dave Landsman)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 22:59:41 +0000
Subject: SAT-3 Meeting - Monday - December 10 - SanDisk
Message-ID: <mailman.374.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212071_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Just a last minute update:
Turns out that I won't be arriving till about 10am on Monday morning.  My
colleague, Yishai Kagan, has agreed to host until I arrive.  He will be at
the lobby to greet you, or there will be a note how to reach him.  Yishai's
mobile is: 408.544.0601; mine is 206.484.4782, though I'll be on plane from
7-9am.	dave
From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of Dave Landsman
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 08:48
To: t10 at t10.org
Subject: SAT-3 Meeting - Monday - December 10 - SanDisk
The SAT-3 meeting will be on Monday, December 10, at SanDisk, 601 McCarthy
Blvd, Milpitas, CA.  See meeting announcement
(http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-451r0.pdf) for full information.
Please RSVP so we have enough coffee and goodies.  Dave
Dave Landsman | Sr. Staff Engineer
Standardization and Industry Associations
SanDisk | m. 206.484.4782 | t. 206.275.4385
________________________________
PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is
intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that you have received this message in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy
any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or
electronically stored copies).


From lohmeyer at t10.org  Sat Dec  8 23:01:22 2012
From: lohmeyer at t10.org (T10 Document Administrator)
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 00:01:22 -0700
Subject: Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2012/12/02
Message-ID: <mailman.375.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 Document Administrator <lohmeyer at t10.org>
*
Proposals
---------
SOP: Late Letter Ballot Comment - Reference SPC for OUI
(by: George Penokie)
T10/13-010r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/04   58089 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-010r0.pdf
INCITS T10 Case Study on SCSI Standards
(by: John Lohmeyer)
T10/13-012r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/06   17487 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-012r0.pdf
Letter Ballot on forwarding SBC-3 to First Public Review
(by: John Lohmeyer)
T10/13-013r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/07   34250 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-013r0.pdf
Working Drafts
--------------
SCSI Block Commands - 3 (SBC-3)
(Editor: Mark Evans)
 Rev: 34b      Uploaded: 2012/12/07   2432583 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=sbc3r34b.pdf
SCSI Block Commands - 3 (SBC-3)
(Editor: Mark Evans)
 Rev: 35       Uploaded: 2012/12/07   2433315 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=sbc3r35.pdf
(Report generated on 2012/12/09 at 00:01:22)
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From Mark.Evans at wdc.com  Mon Dec 10 11:20:22 2012
From: Mark.Evans at wdc.com (Mark Evans)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:20:22 +0000
Subject: SBC-3: T10 Letter Ballot T10LBVOTE 13-013r0
Message-ID: <mailman.376.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Mark Evans <Mark.Evans at wdc.com>
*
Hello all,
For those of you making letter ballot comments on SBC-3, I would appreciate
receiving those comments in fdf format.  If you don't have the ability to
comment in fdf format, then, particularly if you only have a few comments,
text is fine.  If you have many comments and don't have the ability to
comment in fdf format, then please contact me, and I can supply you with a
version of the SBC-3 rev 35 pdf that will allow you to create comments in
Adobe reader.
Please feel free to send an email to me with any comments or questions that
you have about this stuff. 
Regards, 
Mark Evans
Email: mark.evans at wdc.com
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From alvin.cox at seagate.com  Mon Dec 10 13:41:28 2012
From: alvin.cox at seagate.com (Alvin Cox)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:41:28 -0600
Subject: Topics for SAS PHY call on 12/13
Message-ID: <mailman.377.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212101_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Much of the discussion on the last call concerned the leakage current
specification for the Power Disable signal. I will not have an update until
next week (12/20 call).
Does anyone have additional topics for this week?
12G cable requirements (Molex)
Others?
Let me know by EOB 12/11. I will cancel this week's call if I receive no
responses for topics to be discussed.
-- 
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Cell 405-206-4809
Office 405-392-3738
E-Mail	alvin.cox at seagate.com


From curtis.stevens at wdc.com  Tue Dec 11 15:46:53 2012
From: curtis.stevens at wdc.com (Curtis Stevens)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:46:53 +0000
Subject: January T10 romm reservation Cut-Off
Message-ID: <mailman.378.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212110_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

The reservation cut-off date is this Friday (14-Dec).  If you are planning on
attending, now would be the right time to make your reservation.
-------------------------------------------------
Curtis E. Stevens
Director, Standards & Features Technology
3355 Michelson Dr. #100
Office: 1-1041
Irvine, Ca. 92612
Phone: 949-672-7933
Cell: 949-307-5050
E-Mail: Curtis.Stevens at WDC.com
Remember, you may only be blamed for something if you are actually doing
something.


From alvin.cox at seagate.com  Wed Dec 12 11:29:52 2012
From: alvin.cox at seagate.com (Alvin Cox)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:29:52 -0600
Subject: No SAS PHY call 12/13/12
Message-ID: <mailman.379.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212120_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

No SAS PHY call on 12/13. There will be one on 12/20.
-- 
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Cell 405-206-4809
Office 405-392-3738
E-Mail	alvin.cox at seagate.com


From kdbutt at us.ibm.com  Wed Dec 12 15:48:07 2012
From: kdbutt at us.ibm.com (Kevin D Butt)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:48:07 -0700
Subject: Late SPC-4 Letter Ballot comment request
Message-ID: <mailman.380.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212121_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

IBM would like to request a late letter ballot comment against SPC-4 to 
consider an additional way to indicate when an Error history snapshot is 
lost.  The following text highlights what is currently stated about error 
history snapshots, their persistent requirements, how to report a loss of 
a snapshot or error history I_T nexus, and that there may be vendor 
specific methods to retrieve error history.
It is well known that Unit Attentions are often swallowed by application 
client stacks before the application has a chance to see them.	For this 
reason, having a Check Condition instead of a UA is preferable, at least 
in some environments.  Also, error history may be retrieved by vendor 
specific methods or other READ BUFFER command sequences.  The size of the 
error history buffers in some implementations could be such that these 
other methods would have to share these error history buffers.	Or other 
vendor specific requirements may force a release of the error history 
snapshot.  Currently, this would be a violation of the standard.
We would like to allow vendor specific events in addition to the timer to 
cause a release of the snapshot.  We would also like to report this 
through a Check Condition, ILLEGAL REQUEST, ERROR HISTORY SNAPSHOT 
RELEASED on a subsequent READ BUFFER with mode 1Ch.
<<
5.5.2 Retrieving error history with the READ BUFFER command
The device server shall not replace or release the error history snapshot 
while the error history I_T nexus is established.
The device server shall implement a vendor specific timer for error 
history snapshot retrieval. If the vendor specific timer expires, then:
  a) the device server shall:
    A) clear the error history I_T nexus; and
    B) establish a unit attention condition for the error history I_T 
nexus with the additional sense code set to ERROR HISTORY I_T NEXUS 
CLEARED;
  or
  b) the device server shall:
    A) clear the error history I_T nexus;
    B) release the error history snapshot; and
    C) establish a unit attention condition for the error history I_T 
nexus with the additional sense code set to ERROR HISTORY SNAPSHOT 
RELEASED.
Error history may also be retrieved by vendor specific methods or other 
READ BUFFER command sequences that are outside the scope of this standard.
>>
Thanks,
Kevin D. Butt
SCSI & Fibre Channel Architect, Tape Firmware
Data Protection & Retention
MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
Tel: 520-799-5280
Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com


From gerry.houlder at seagate.com  Thu Dec 13 06:46:34 2012
From: gerry.houlder at seagate.com (Gerry Houlder)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0600
Subject: Late SPC-4 Letter Ballot comment request
Message-ID: <mailman.381.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212130_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

It is unclear how your new requirements should be inserted into the quoted
text. Have you prepared a proposal for this?
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Kevin D Butt <kdbutt at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> IBM would like to request a late letter ballot comment against SPC-4 to
> consider an additional way to indicate when an Error history snapshot is
> lost.  The following text highlights what is currently stated about error
> history snapshots, their persistent requirements, how to report a loss of a
> snapshot or error history I_T nexus, and that there may be vendor specific
> methods to retrieve error history.
>
> It is well known that Unit Attentions are often swallowed by application
> client stacks before the application has a chance to see them.  For this
> reason, having a Check Condition instead of a UA is preferable, at least in
> some environments.  Also, error history may be retrieved by vendor specific
> methods or other READ BUFFER command sequences.  The size of the error
> history buffers in some implementations could be such that these other
> methods would have to share these error history buffers.  Or other vendor
> specific requirements may force a release of the error history snapshot.
>  Currently, this would be a violation of the standard.
>
> We would like to allow vendor specific events in addition to the timer to
> cause a release of the snapshot.  We would also like to report this through
> a Check Condition, ILLEGAL REQUEST, ERROR HISTORY SNAPSHOT RELEASED on a
> subsequent READ BUFFER with mode 1Ch.
>
> <<
> 5.5.2 Retrieving error history with the READ BUFFER command
>
> The device server shall not replace or release the error history snapshot
> while the error history I_T nexus is established.
>
> The device server shall implement a vendor specific timer for error
> history snapshot retrieval. If the vendor specific timer expires, then:
>   a) the device server shall:
>     A) clear the error history I_T nexus; and
>     B) establish a unit attention condition for the error history I_T
> nexus with the additional sense code set to ERROR HISTORY I_T NEXUS
CLEARED;
>   or
>   b) the device server shall:
>     A) clear the error history I_T nexus;
>     B) release the error history snapshot; and
>     C) establish a unit attention condition for the error history I_T
> nexus with the additional sense code set to ERROR HISTORY SNAPSHOT
RELEASED.
>
> Error history may also be retrieved by vendor specific methods or other
> READ BUFFER command sequences that are outside the scope of this standard.
> >>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin D. Butt
> SCSI & Fibre Channel Architect, Tape Firmware
> Data Protection & Retention
> MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
> Tel: 520-799-5280
> Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
> Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com
> http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/


From MOverby at nvidia.com  Thu Dec 13 10:53:46 2012
From: MOverby at nvidia.com (Mark Overby)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:53:46 -0800
Subject: SAT-3 LB comment resolutions from face to face
Message-ID: <mailman.382.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212131_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Have been posted in the master LB comment resolution document (12-422) in
revision 3.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution
is prohibited.	If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------


From kdbutt at us.ibm.com  Fri Dec 14 12:49:11 2012
From: kdbutt at us.ibm.com (Kevin D Butt)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:49:11 -0700
Subject: Late SPC-4 Letter Ballot comment request
Message-ID: <mailman.383.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212140_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

No, I have not prepared a proposal.  If there is opposition to the concept 
then I won't waste time preparing a proposal.  If the late letter ballot 
comment is accepted then I'll write a proposal for review.
Kevin D. Butt
SCSI & Fibre Channel Architect, Tape Firmware
Data Protection & Retention
MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
Tel: 520-799-5280
Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/ 
From:	Gerry Houlder <gerry.houlder at seagate.com>
To:	T10 Reflector <t10 at t10.org>, 
Date:	12/13/2012 08:21 AM
Subject:	Re: Late SPC-4 Letter Ballot comment request
Sent by:	owner-t10 at t10.org
It is unclear how your new requirements should be inserted into the quoted 
text. Have you prepared a proposal for this?
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Kevin D Butt <kdbutt at us.ibm.com> wrote:
IBM would like to request a late letter ballot comment against SPC-4 to 
consider an additional way to indicate when an Error history snapshot is 
lost.  The following text highlights what is currently stated about error 
history snapshots, their persistent requirements, how to report a loss of 
a snapshot or error history I_T nexus, and that there may be vendor 
specific methods to retrieve error history. 
It is well known that Unit Attentions are often swallowed by application 
client stacks before the application has a chance to see them.	For this 
reason, having a Check Condition instead of a UA is preferable, at least 
in some environments.  Also, error history may be retrieved by vendor 
specific methods or other READ BUFFER command sequences.  The size of the 
error history buffers in some implementations could be such that these 
other methods would have to share these error history buffers.	Or other 
vendor specific requirements may force a release of the error history 
snapshot.  Currently, this would be a violation of the standard. 
We would like to allow vendor specific events in addition to the timer to 
cause a release of the snapshot.  We would also like to report this 
through a Check Condition, ILLEGAL REQUEST, ERROR HISTORY SNAPSHOT 
RELEASED on a subsequent READ BUFFER with mode 1Ch. 
<< 
5.5.2 Retrieving error history with the READ BUFFER command 
The device server shall not replace or release the error history snapshot 
while the error history I_T nexus is established. 
The device server shall implement a vendor specific timer for error 
history snapshot retrieval. If the vendor specific timer expires, then: 
  a) the device server shall: 
    A) clear the error history I_T nexus; and 
    B) establish a unit attention condition for the error history I_T 
nexus with the additional sense code set to ERROR HISTORY I_T NEXUS 
CLEARED; 
  or 
  b) the device server shall: 
    A) clear the error history I_T nexus; 
    B) release the error history snapshot; and 
    C) establish a unit attention condition for the error history I_T 
nexus with the additional sense code set to ERROR HISTORY SNAPSHOT 
RELEASED. 
Error history may also be retrieved by vendor specific methods or other 
READ BUFFER command sequences that are outside the scope of this standard. 
>> 
Thanks, 
Kevin D. Butt
SCSI & Fibre Channel Architect, Tape Firmware
Data Protection & Retention
MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
Tel: 520-799-5280
Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/ 


From lohmeyer at t10.org  Sat Dec 15 23:01:22 2012
From: lohmeyer at t10.org (T10 Document Administrator)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 00:01:22 -0700
Subject: Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2012/12/09
Message-ID: <mailman.384.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 Document Administrator <lohmeyer at t10.org>
*
Proposals
---------
SAT-3: Letter Ballot Comment Resolutions
(by: Mark Overby)
T10/12-422r2   Uploaded: 2012/12/10   5653088 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-422r2.pdf
SAT-3: Letter Ballot Comment Resolutions
(by: Mark Overby)
T10/12-422r3   Uploaded: 2012/12/13   5780100 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-422r3.pdf
SOP -  Nexus Loss Async Event
(by: Kevin Marks)
T10/13-009r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/12   22863 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-009r0.pdf
Working Drafts
--------------
(Report generated on 2012/12/16 at 00:01:22)
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From sheng-liang.zhang at oracle.com  Sun Dec 16 06:12:05 2012
From: sheng-liang.zhang at oracle.com (Shengliang Zhang)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:12:05 +0800
Subject: About translation between SCSI command set and NVMe command set
Message-ID: <mailman.385.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Shengliang Zhang <sheng-liang.zhang at oracle.com>
*
Hi,
I am reading the draft 'sop-r04a', it says that NVMe may be the PCIe 
queuing layer.
Is there any doc which depicts the translation between SCSI command set 
and NVMe command set ?
Will this be a part of SCSI express standards ?
Thanks in advance!
Shengliang
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From santosh.s2 at samsung.com  Sun Dec 16 18:52:22 2012
From: santosh.s2 at samsung.com (SANTOSH SINGH)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 02:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: About translation between SCSI command set and NVMe command set
Message-ID: <mailman.386.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212162_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212162_201212170823623_qknmbdif.gif">201212170823623_qknmbdif.gif</a>


From sheng-liang.zhang at oracle.com  Sun Dec 16 19:08:37 2012
From: sheng-liang.zhang at oracle.com (Shengliang Zhang)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:08:37 +0800
Subject: About translation between SCSI command set and NVMe command set
Message-ID: <mailman.387.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212163_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212163_nameless-156-3.gif">nameless-156-3.gif</a>

On 12/17/2012 10:52 AM, SANTOSH SINGH wrote:
>
> Hi Shengliang,
>
> There is a SCSI/NVMe translation document on www.nvmexpress.org 
> <http://www.nvmexpress.org&gt;, you can download from there.
>
Santosh,
Thanks for your reply.	I find that document!
Will this be a standard ? like SAT (Translation between SCSI and ATA).
Who is responsible for the publish of that doc ? T10 or NVMHCI working 
group ?
Thanks,
Shengliang
> Regards
>
> Santosh
>
> ------- *Original Message* -------
>
> *Sender* : Shengliang Zhang<sheng-liang.zhang at oracle.com>
>
> *Date* : Dec 16, 2012 23:12 (GMT+09:00)
>
> *Title* : About translation between SCSI command set and NVMe command set
>
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
> * Shengliang Zhang
> *
> Hi,
>
> I am reading the draft 'sop-r04a', it says that NVMe may be the PCIe
> queuing layer.
>
> Is there any doc which depicts the translation between SCSI command set
> and NVMe command set ?
> Will this be a part of SCSI express standards ?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Shengliang
> *
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
>


From santosh.s2 at samsung.com  Sun Dec 16 19:47:48 2012
From: santosh.s2 at samsung.com (SANTOSH SINGH)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 03:47:48 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: About translation between SCSI command set and NVMe command set
Message-ID: <mailman.388.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212164_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212164_201212170919721_bei0xt4n.gif">201212170919721_bei0xt4n.gif</a>


From roweber at ieee.org  Mon Dec 17 05:40:03 2012
From: roweber at ieee.org (Ralph Weber)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:40:03 -0600
Subject: Document uploaded for tomorrow's Conglomerates conference call
Message-ID: <mailman.389.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
A new revision of the SAM-5 changes that define the Logical Unit
Conglomerates class has been uploaded.
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-247r8.pdf
This document will be discussed during tomorrow's conference call
(SCSI LU Conglomerates Call -- Tue Dec 18 2:30p-4:30p CST). For
details of the call see:
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1211121.htm
All the best,
.Ralph
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From Stephen.Finch at wdc.com  Tue Dec 18 07:05:06 2012
From: Stephen.Finch at wdc.com (Stephen Finch)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:05:06 +0000
Subject: SOP/PQI Proposal 12-457
Message-ID: <mailman.390.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212180_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

I am withdrawing my proposal 12-457 SOP/PQI: Making Some Checks During SGL
Processing Optional
Stephen Finch
720 864-4751
720 883-1414 (cell)
Western Digital, Longmont


From alvin.cox at seagate.com  Wed Dec 19 07:35:36 2012
From: alvin.cox at seagate.com (Alvin Cox)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:35:36 -0600
Subject: Reminder: SAS PHY teleconference Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:00 am CST
Message-ID: <mailman.391.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212190_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

*Note that the audio connection has changed.
WebEx will call you back or you can dial in with one of the numbers
provided.*
Agenda:
SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE (12-363r7) [Cox]
Connector related
Electrical
Other items
WebEx:
Topic: SAS-3
Date: Every Thursday, from Thursday, December 20, 2012 to Thursday, January
3, 2013
Time: 10:00 am, Central Standard Time (Chicago, GMT-06:00)
Meeting Number: 827 988 093
Meeting Password: sas12gbps
-------------------------------------------------------
To join the online meeting (Now from mobile devices!)
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/j.php?ED=158650437&UID=0&PW=NODQzMjNhYTdm&R
T=MiM3
2. If requested, enter your name and email address.
3. If a password is required, enter the meeting password: sas12gbps
4. Click "Join".
5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen.
To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/j.php?ED=158650437&UID=0&PW=NODQzMjNhYTdm&O
RT=MiM3
-------------------------------------------------------
To join the audio conference only
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Provide your number when you join the meeting to receive a call back.
Alternatively, you can call one of the following numbers:
SeaTel: 8-844-1000
United States: 1-952-230-1270
US Toll-Free: 1-855-856-8765
Singapore: 65-6485-3969
China-Beijing: 86-10-5875-1983
China-Shanghai: 86-21-6141-6283
China-Shenzhen: 86-755-2547-1583
China-Suzhou: 86-512-6273-5995
China-Wuxi: 86-510-8527-3993
Korea-Suwon: 82-31-8025-6006
Malaysia-Penang: 60-4-291-3598
Malaysia-Johore: 60-7-555-6767
Thailand-Teparuk: 66-2-715-7878
Thailand-Korat: 66-44-703599
Taiwan-Taipei: 886-2-2514-2211
2. Follow the instructions that you hear on the phone.
Your Cisco Unified MeetingPlace meeting ID: 827 988 093
-------------------------------------------------------
For assistance
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/mc
2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support".
You can contact me at:
alvin.cox at seagate.com
1-405-392-3738
To update this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft
Outlook), click this link:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/j.php?ED=158650437&UID=0&ICS=UMI&LD=1&RD=2&
ST=1&SHA2=pEI2tL0j5oE58s9ytOQWHuV98SACdVZgiFnrG-CNDds=&RT=MiM3
WebEx will automatically setup Meeting Manager for Windows the first time
you join a meeting. To save time, you can setup prior to the meeting by
clicking this link:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/meetingcenter/mcsetup.php
The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files
requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the
meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your
computer by going to https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/systemdiagnosis.php.
http://www.webex.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio
and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the
session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent
to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your
concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do
not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject
to discovery in the event of litigation.


From curtis.stevens at wdc.com  Wed Dec 19 16:10:54 2012
From: curtis.stevens at wdc.com (Curtis Stevens)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:10:54 +0000
Subject: January T10 Meeting
Message-ID: <mailman.392.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212191_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

The official room block is now closed for the January plenary.	The hotel is
still making rooms in the room block available based on availability.  If you
are planning on coming, you should make your reservations immediately.
-------------------------------------------------
Curtis E. Stevens
Director, Standards & Features Technology
3355 Michelson Dr. #100
Office: 1-1041
Irvine, Ca. 92612
Phone: 949-672-7933
Cell: 949-307-5050
E-Mail: Curtis.Stevens at WDC.com
Remember, you may only be blamed for something if you are actually doing
something.


From alvin.cox at seagate.com  Thu Dec 20 08:06:25 2012
From: alvin.cox at seagate.com (Alvin Cox)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:06:25 -0600
Subject: SAS PHY call webex.
Message-ID: <mailman.393.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212200_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alvin Cox <messenger at webex.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:03 AM
Subject: (Forward to attendees) Please join now, meeting in progress:
Instant meeting
To: alvin.cox at seagate.com
**** You can forward this email invitation to attendees ****
Hello ,
Please join my meeting that is currently in progress.
Topic: Instant meeting
Date: Thursday, December 20, 2012
Time: 10:03 am, Central Standard Time (Chicago, GMT-06:00)
Meeting Number: 820 285 019
Meeting Password: alvincox9
-------------------------------------------------------
To join the online meeting (Now from mobile devices!)
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/e.php?AT=MI&EventID=177622327&UID=0&PW=NNWU
4ODBkMGU3&RT=MiM3
2. If requested, enter your name and email address.
3. If a password is required, enter the meeting password: alvincox9
4. Click "Join".
5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen.
To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/e.php?AT=MI&EventID=177622327&UID=0&PW=NNWU
4ODBkMGU3&ORT=MiM3
-------------------------------------------------------
For assistance
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to https://seagate.webex.com/seagate/mc
2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support".
You can contact me at:
alvin.cox at seagate.com
1-405-392-3738
http://www.webex.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio
and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the
session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent
to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your
concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do
not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject
to discovery in the event of litigation.
-- 
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Cell 405-206-4809
Office 405-392-3738
E-Mail	alvin.cox at seagate.com


From tjmac at tolisgroup.com  Thu Dec 20 08:51:55 2012
From: tjmac at tolisgroup.com (Tim Jones)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:51:55 -0700
Subject: Happy Holidays!
Message-ID: <mailman.394.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212201_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Attachment #1: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212201_icon_smile.gif">icon_smile.gif</a>
Attachment #2: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1212201_tolisshadow100.png">tolisshadow100.png</a>

To All,
I wanted to take a moment to wish everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah,
and a very exciting end of the world or Happy New Year (which ever way you're
leaning  ).  Your continued dedication to the T10 topics have kept our team
sane when working with the myriad devices through the years.
Tim
--
Tim Jones					tjmac at tolisgroup.com
President/CTO				http://www.tolisgroup.com
TOLIS Group, Inc.			http://www.productionbackup.com
480-505-0488 x227			480-505-0492 (fax)
BRU ... Because it's the RESTORE that matters


From roweber at ieee.org  Thu Dec 20 19:18:49 2012
From: roweber at ieee.org (Ralph Weber)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:18:49 -0600
Subject: New revision of Logical Unit Conglomerates proposal
Message-ID: <mailman.395.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
Based on the results of the 18 December conference call
(and subsequent e-mail exchanges), a new revision of the
Logical Unit Conglomerates SAM-5 changes has been uploaded.
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-247r9.pdf
Requests for additional changes will be processed on a
time-available basis.
All the best,
.Ralph
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From lohmeyer at t10.org  Sat Dec 22 23:01:22 2012
From: lohmeyer at t10.org (T10 Document Administrator)
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:01:22 -0700
Subject: Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2012/12/16
Message-ID: <mailman.396.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 Document Administrator <lohmeyer at t10.org>
*
Proposals
---------
Logical Unit Groups (aka Conglomerates) in SAM-5 and SPC-5
(by: Ralph Weber)
T10/12-247r8   Uploaded: 2012/12/17   117007 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-247r8.pdf
Logical Unit Groups (aka Conglomerates) in SAM-5 and SPC-5
(by: Ralph Weber)
T10/12-247r9   Uploaded: 2012/12/20   139899 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-247r9.pdf
SPL-3 Persistent Connection
(by: George Penokie)
T10/12-251r7   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   618168 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-251r7.pdf
SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
(by: Alvin Cox)
T10/12-363r7   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   283239 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-363r7.pdf
SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
(by: Alvin Cox)
T10/12-363r8   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   355145 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-363r8.pdf
PQI Letter Ballot Comments Incorporated in PQI-R06
(by: Ie-Wei Njoo)
T10/12-373r4   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   9729849 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-373r4.fdf
PQI Letter Ballot Comments Incorporated in PQI-R06
(by: Ie-Wei Njoo)
T10/12-373r4   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   86032 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-373r4.pdf
PQI Letter Ballot Comments Incorporated in PQI-R06
(by: Ie-Wei Njoo)
T10/12-373r4   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   1205248 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-373r4.xls
SPL-3:Management ECM/Application Client connection close request
(by: George Penokie)
T10/12-380r4   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   559313 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-380r4.pdf
SBC-4 Add reporting of unrecoverable errors that aren;t reassigned
(by: Gerald Houlder)
T10/12-402r1   Uploaded: 2012/12/18   98059 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-402r1.pdf
Meeting Announcement: T10 Week Mar 11-15, 2013 -- Vancouver, BC
(by: Tim Symons)
T10/12-421r1   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   42606 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-421r1.pdf
SAM-5 SBC-4 SPC-5 Time Priority
(by: Dan Colegrove)
T10/12-425r1   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   110175 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-425r1.pdf
SOP PQI Class diagrams for PQI domains
(by: Rob Elliott)
T10/12-426r3   Uploaded: 2012/12/20   211539 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-426r3.pdf
SPL-3:Clarifications to SP_P_C and SP_P_S State Machines
(by: George Penokie)
T10/13-006r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   173842 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-006r0.pdf
SOP: Incomplete I_L_T_Q definition can cause failures
(by: Stephen Finch)
T10/13-015r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/18   79225 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-015r0.pdf
SAM-5: Fix for Incorrect Incorporation of Multiple Proposals
Modifying Same Text
(by: George Penokie)
T10/13-016r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/18   73359 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-016r0.pdf
SAM-5: Fix for Incorrect Incorporation of Multiple Proposals
Modifying Same Text
(by: George Penokie)
T10/13-016r1   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   73355 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-016r1.pdf
T11 Liaison Report December 2012
(by: Steven Wilson)
T10/13-017r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/19   25061 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-017r0.pdf
SAS3_PHY: SAS3_EYEOPENING script release
(by: Mathieu Gagnon)
T10/13-018r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   170357 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-018r0.pdf
SAS3_PHY: SAS3_EYEOPENING script release
(by: Mathieu Gagnon)
T10/13-018r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/21   86498 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-018r0.zip
Working Drafts
--------------
PCIe(r) architecture Queuing Interface (PQI)
(Editor: Ie-Wei Njoo)
 Rev: 06e      Uploaded: 2012/12/21   2276453 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=pqi-r06e.pdf
(Report generated on 2012/12/23 at 00:01:22)
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From roweber at ieee.org  Wed Dec 26 03:09:29 2012
From: roweber at ieee.org (Ralph Weber)
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:09:29 -0600
Subject: Updates to Logical Unit Conglomerates doc 12-247r9 yield 13-020r0
Message-ID: <mailman.397.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
Two bugs were reported in the Logical Unit Conglomerates proposal
(one typo, and the other messy). The document that contains the
corrections is:
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-020r0.pdf
As a bonus prize, the document number hit has been taken now
and the January CAP minutes will have not have to mention any
two-numbers revised-document activities.
All the best,
.Ralph
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From lohmeyer at t10.org  Fri Dec 28 01:00:00 2012
From: lohmeyer at t10.org (T10 List Manager)
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:00:00 -0700
Subject: T10 Reflector Monthly Reminder
Message-ID: <mailman.398.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 List Manager <lohmeyer at t10.org>
*
This is an automatic monthly posting to the T10 Reflector.  If you
receive this message, it means that you are subscribed to the T10
Reflector email list.
The T10 Reflector is provided by the SCSI Trade Association and
maintained by LSI Corp. This reflector exists to discuss INCITS
T10 Technical Committee issues and to disseminate T10-related
information (minutes, meeting notices, etc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
You do not need to be an INCITS T10 Technical Committee member to
use this reflector, however you must agree to:
 * read the INCITS Patent Policy and the INCITS Antitrust Guidelines
 * acknowledge that the activities of the T10 Technical Committee are
   governed by the INCITS policies and procedures as specified in the
   reference documents RD-1 and RD-2
 * acknowledge that draft documents may change at any time, without notice.
The INCITS Patent Policy, the INCITS Antitrust Guidelines, the RD-1, and
the RD-2 are all available on the www.incits.org web site.
If you do not agree to the above conditions, then you must unsubscribe
to this reflector.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
T10 Reflector is not intended to carry commercial traffic. People who post
advertisements, job offers, etc. will be removed from the reflector.
Please visit http://www.t10.org/t10r.htm for instructions on subscribing,
unsubscribing, or searching the T10 Reflector archives.
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org


From lohmeyer at t10.org  Sat Dec 29 23:01:22 2012
From: lohmeyer at t10.org (T10 Document Administrator)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:01:22 -0700
Subject: Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2012/12/23
Message-ID: <mailman.399.1441607379.22528.t10@sandbox.t10.org>

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* T10 Document Administrator <lohmeyer at t10.org>
*
Proposals
---------
PQI Letter Ballot Comments Incorporated in PQI-R06
(by: Ie-Wei Njoo)
T10/12-373r5   Uploaded: 2012/12/27   9735008 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-373r5.fdf
PQI Letter Ballot Comments Incorporated in PQI-R06
(by: Ie-Wei Njoo)
T10/12-373r5   Uploaded: 2012/12/27   86493 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-373r5.pdf
PQI Letter Ballot Comments Incorporated in PQI-R06
(by: Ie-Wei Njoo)
T10/12-373r5   Uploaded: 2012/12/27   1205248 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-373r5.xls
SBC-4 Add reporting of unrecoverable errors that aren't reassigned
(by: Gerald Houlder)
T10/12-402r1   Uploaded: 2012/12/26   61026 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=12-402r1.pdf
SSC-4: Letter Ballot Comment Database
(by: David Peterson)
T10/13-019r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/24   3114993 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-019r0.pdf
Logical Unit Groups (aka Conglomerates) in SAM-5 and SPC-5
(by: Ralph Weber)
T10/13-020r0   Uploaded: 2012/12/26   140517 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=d&f=13-020r0.pdf
Working Drafts
--------------
PCIe(r) architecture Queuing Interface (PQI)
(Editor: Ie-Wei Njoo)
 Rev: 06f      Uploaded: 2012/12/27   2139185 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=pqi-r06f.pdf
SCSI Stream Commands - 4
(Editor: Dave Peterson)
 Rev: 02c      Uploaded: 2012/12/24   4387514 bytes
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=ssc4r02c.pdf
(Report generated on 2012/12/30 at 00:01:22)
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org