[MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file

[Takaharu Ai]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>
*
Hello Katata-san,
Thank you for the detail information and the history of the Fuji style
guide.
(BFrom the beginning of Fuji7, the style guide primarily referred was T10,
not ISO. So you decided this issue was editorial.
I think it is understandable and acceptable.
Thank you very much!
Best Regards,
Harry Ai
HAVBU,
AVC Networks Company,
Panasonic Corporation
Osaka, Japan
---------------- Start of the original message ----------------
>From: keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
>To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>Cc: t10 at t10.org
>Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:34:33 +0900
>Subject: Re: [MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file
>
> 
> 
> Hello Ai-san,
> 
> I asked Kohda-san about this issue. Then I remembered that we discussed
about
> numerical expression and section layout at the beginning of Fuji7.
> 
> At 01/21/2006, George Penokie (T10 editor) released T10 style guideline.
Mark
> Overby transferred it to T13 on the day. Bill McFerrin posted an email that
> proposed an adjustment of MMC5 to follow the T10 style guideline.
> 
> Kohda-san explained this situation in Fuji meeting. Then Kohda-san
commented
> that he followed T10 style guideline for the numerical expression. Members
> wanted to keep the Fuji section layout.
> 
> The venues of the submission of Fuji document are SFFC and T10. To SFFC we
will
> submit our document to be a SFFC document. To T10 we will submit our
document to
> be a proposal document from ODD industry. So we (editors) refer to a style
> guideline of them. SFFC does not have its style guideline, so editors
referred
> to T10 style guideline. At 01/21/2006, the T10 style guideline said the
> numerical expression was "ISO style". So Kohda-san wrote "ISO style" in 1.9
> Change history of Mt.Fuji Ver. 7 Revision 0.6.
> 
> At 08/26/2011, I received a comment from Joe Breher and Kevin D. Butt about
> Units of measure. So I followed the T10 style guideline about the numerical
> expression again. The current style guideline "T10 Style Guide (10-316r6)"
does
> not use the "ISO style". So I changed the "ISO style" to  "T10 style".
> 
> Ai-san, how do you feel this history?
> Members, please send your comment to reflector or me.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Keiji Katata
> PIONEER CORP.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>@avc-pioneer.com on 2011/10/24
> 01:14:58
> 
> mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
> 
> $BAw?.<T(B:     owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> $B08 at h(B:  mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
> cc:	 t10 at t10.org
> $B7oL>(B:  Re: [MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file
> 
> Hello Katata-san,
> 
> Thank you for your effort to edit the huge document.
> 
> I have one question about the document style.
> 
> According to Fuji7 and later documents, it was clearly said that Fuji
> group adopted ISO style as its document style as follows;
>     The representation of decimal number and decimal sign used in this
>     specification is ISO style (i.e., each group of three digits from
>     decimal sign are separated by a space and a comma is used as the
>     decimal sign). Table 3 shows the example of decimal number
>     representation.
> 
> But you changed above sentence to as follows;
>     The representation of decimal number and decimal sign used in this
>     specification is T10 style
> 
> Why did you change the document style from ISO to T10 without any
> discussion among Fuji members?
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Harry Ai
> HAVBU,
> AVC Networks Company,
> Panasonic Corporation
> Osaka, Japan
> 
> 
> ---------------- Start of the original message ----------------
> >From: keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
> >To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
> >Cc: t10 at t10.org
> >Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:43:02 +0900
> >Subject: [MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I posted Fuji8 Rev.0.992 and its comment file on ftp.
> > ftp.avc-pioneer.com/Mtfuji_8/Spec
> >  FUJI8R0992diff.zip
> >  commnet_fuji8-1.pdf
> >
> > I worked for comments from Ai-san without any technical changes.
> > I would like to propose ONE week review by Oct.26. before creating rev.
1.00.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Keiji Katata
> > PIONEER CORP.
> 
> ----------------- End of the original message -----------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
----------------- End of the original message -----------------
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org