[MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file

[keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
*
Hello Ai-san,
I asked Kohda-san about this issue. Then I remembered that we discussed about
numerical expression and section layout at the beginning of Fuji7.
At 01/21/2006, George Penokie (T10 editor) released T10 style guideline. Mark
Overby transferred it to T13 on the day. Bill McFerrin posted an email that
proposed an adjustment of MMC5 to follow the T10 style guideline.
Kohda-san explained this situation in Fuji meeting. Then Kohda-san commented
that he followed T10 style guideline for the numerical expression. Members
wanted to keep the Fuji section layout.
The venues of the submission of Fuji document are SFFC and T10. To SFFC we
will
submit our document to be a SFFC document. To T10 we will submit our document
to
be a proposal document from ODD industry. So we (editors) refer to a style
guideline of them. SFFC does not have its style guideline, so editors
referred
to T10 style guideline. At 01/21/2006, the T10 style guideline said the
numerical expression was "ISO style". So Kohda-san wrote "ISO style" in 1.9
Change history of Mt.Fuji Ver. 7 Revision 0.6.
At 08/26/2011, I received a comment from Joe Breher and Kevin D. Butt about
Units of measure. So I followed the T10 style guideline about the numerical
expression again. The current style guideline "T10 Style Guide (10-316r6)"
does
not use the "ISO style". So I changed the "ISO style" to  "T10 style".
Ai-san, how do you feel this history?
Members, please send your comment to reflector or me.
Best regards,
Keiji Katata
PIONEER CORP.
Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>@avc-pioneer.com on 2011/10/24
01:14:58
mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
$BAw?.<T(B:	  owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
$B08 at h(B:  mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
cc:    t10 at t10.org
$B7oL>(B:  Re: [MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file
Hello Katata-san,
Thank you for your effort to edit the huge document.
I have one question about the document style.
According to Fuji7 and later documents, it was clearly said that Fuji
group adopted ISO style as its document style as follows;
    The representation of decimal number and decimal sign used in this
    specification is ISO style (i.e., each group of three digits from
    decimal sign are separated by a space and a comma is used as the
    decimal sign). Table 3 shows the example of decimal number
    representation.
But you changed above sentence to as follows;
    The representation of decimal number and decimal sign used in this
    specification is T10 style
Why did you change the document style from ISO to T10 without any
discussion among Fuji members?
Best Regards,
Harry Ai
HAVBU,
AVC Networks Company,
Panasonic Corporation
Osaka, Japan
---------------- Start of the original message ----------------
>From: keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
>To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>Cc: t10 at t10.org
>Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:43:02 +0900
>Subject: [MtFuji] Posted: fuji8 rev.0.992 and comment file
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I posted Fuji8 Rev.0.992 and its comment file on ftp.
> ftp.avc-pioneer.com/Mtfuji_8/Spec
>  FUJI8R0992diff.zip
>  commnet_fuji8-1.pdf
>
> I worked for comments from Ai-san without any technical changes.
> I would like to propose ONE week review by Oct.26. before creating rev.
1.00.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Keiji Katata
> PIONEER CORP.
----------------- End of the original message -----------------
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org