Formatting error in sbc3r29

Leonid Podolny leonid.podolny at
Wed Dec 7 23:50:27 PST 2011

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* Leonid Podolny <leonid.podolny at>
Good morning,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to report minor errors in 
documents. If it's not, please point me to such place.
There is a minor formatting error in SBC, that makes the understanding a 
bit more difficult.
If I'm not mistaken, in 5.3.1, in the list of what is supposed to happen 
after the successful unit format of non-fully provisioned devices (i.e. 
at the bottom of the page 88 in sbc3r29.pdf), the items C) and D) should 
actually be sub-items of the item B) and not items in their own right.
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list