Bill.Martin at emulex.com Bill.Martin at emulex.com
Thu Sep 23 15:16:21 PDT 2010

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1009234_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

This note is not about compliance, but about what a compliant initiator may
see from older compliant targets.  This note is very helpful in ensuring that
new initiators will still work with targets that are compliant to  older
versions of this specification.
I would recommend that the note remain.
Bill Martin
Office of Technology
Industry Standards
916 765-6875
bill.martin at emulex.com
From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of Gerry Houlder
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:25 PM
To: T10 Reflector
Subject: FCP-4: FCP_RSP IU Note
If you remove this note from FCP-4, it just means that products that don't do
this will not conform to FCP-4. Since none of the older products claim
compliance to FCP-4 (how could they, it didn't exist when they were
introduced) and can still claim compliance to FCP-3 or an older standard,
what harm is there?

More information about the T10 mailing list