Seagate position on T10/07-058r0

Stephen FINCH steve.finch at
Fri Feb 2 08:19:28 PST 2007

Formatted message: <A HREF="r0702022_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</A>

Proposal 07-058r1 (or r0) does not change the requirements of SSC OFF during
SNW1 or SNW2.  
I agree, we do not want to change that requirement.
Steve Finch
From: owner-t10 at [mailto:owner-t10 at] On Behalf Of
Alvin.Cox at
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 7:19 AM
To: t10 at
Subject: Seagate position on T10/07-058r0
Following additional internal discussion, Seagate has no issue with the
timing changes caused by the application of SSC during the OOB signalling.
We do have an issue if SSC is applied during SNW1 or SNW2 with a SAS 1.1
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Tel 405-350-7424
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail	alvin.cox at

More information about the T10 mailing list