Seagate position on T10/07-058r0
steve.finch at st.com
Fri Feb 2 08:19:28 PST 2007
Formatted message: <A HREF="r0702022_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</A>
Proposal 07-058r1 (or r0) does not change the requirements of SSC OFF during
SNW1 or SNW2.
I agree, we do not want to change that requirement.
From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of
Alvin.Cox at seagate.com
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 7:19 AM
To: t10 at t10.org
Subject: Seagate position on T10/07-058r0
Following additional internal discussion, Seagate has no issue with the
timing changes caused by the application of SSC during the OOB signalling.
We do have an issue if SSC is applied during SNW1 or SNW2 with a SAS 1.1
Seagate Technology, LLC
E-Mail alvin.cox at seagate.com
More information about the T10