Seagate position on T10/07-058r0

Stephen FINCH steve.finch at st.com
Fri Feb 2 08:19:28 PST 2007


Formatted message: <A HREF="r0702022_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</A>

Proposal 07-058r1 (or r0) does not change the requirements of SSC OFF during
SNW1 or SNW2.  
I agree, we do not want to change that requirement.
Steve Finch
STMicroelectronics.
  _____  
From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of
Alvin.Cox at seagate.com
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 7:19 AM
To: t10 at t10.org
Subject: Seagate position on T10/07-058r0
Following additional internal discussion, Seagate has no issue with the
timing changes caused by the application of SSC during the OOB signalling.
We do have an issue if SSC is applied during SNW1 or SNW2 with a SAS 1.1
device. 
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Tel 405-350-7424
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail	alvin.cox at seagate.com



More information about the T10 mailing list