Question for RW-DL fast re-format

[keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
*
Ai san, I understood your remark.
So there is no trouble if we use same way as BD-RE.
Best regards,
Keiji Katata
PIONEER CORP.
Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>@avc-pioneer.com on 2006/06/22
12:45:58
mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
$BAw?.<T(B:	  owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
$B08 at h(B:  mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com, t10 at t10.org
cc:
bcc:
$B7oL>(B:  Re: Question for RW-DL fast re-format
Hello Katata-san,
>May I confirm your opinion? You prefer Option 2?
Almost yes. Option 2 with my suggestion.
>[Comment as Pioneer]
>Pioneer proposal is not new idea. BD-RE drive does not write user data area
at
>the default format operation of RE disc. I think it is same reason that 1
hour
>operation time is not acceptable.
You are wrong. MMC does not prohibit to overwrite something on the user
data area on BD-RE for Format Type=00h, altough no vendor won't do that.
But Pioneer's proposal tries to prohibit from doing that.
Best Regards,
Harry Ai
VEBU
Panasonic AVC Networks Company
Matsushita/Panasonic
Osaka, Japan
---------------- Start of the original message ----------------
>From: keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
>To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>Cc: t10 at t10.org
>Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:30:01 +0900
>Subject: Re: Question for RW-DL fast re-format
>
>
>Thank you Ai san,
>
>May I confirm your opinion? You prefer Option 2?
>
>[Comment as Pioneer]
>Pioneer proposal is not new idea. BD-RE drive does not write user data area
at
>the default format operation of RE disc. I think it is same reason that 1
hour
>operation time is not acceptable.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Keiji Katata
>PIONEER CORP.
>
>
>
>
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org