Restart the final review and voting
Takaharu Ai
ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com
Sun Jan 22 20:17:26 PST 2006
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>
*
Hello Katata-san,
Thank you very much for your reply. It becomes very clear.
Best Regards,
Harry Ai
VEBU
Panasonic AVC Networks Company
Matsushita/Panasonic
Osaka, Japan
---------------- Start of the original message ----------------
>From: keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
>To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>Cc: t10 at t10.org
>Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:12:47 +0900
>Subject: Re: Restart the final review and voting
>
>
>Hi Ai san,
>
>I think my 2nd answer was not perfect.
>>><Ans2>
>>>Reduced Border-out with SMA will be allocated at NWA.
> should be
>Reduced Border-out with SMA may be allocated at NWA.
>
>Both ways are no problem. So it is optional.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Keiji Katata
>PIONEER CORP.
>
>
>
>
>
>Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>@avc-pioneer.com on 2006/01/20
>19:24:37
>
>mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
>
>$BAw?.<T(B: owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>
>
>
>
>$B08 at h(B: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>cc: t10 at t10.org
>bcc:
>$B7oL>(B: Re: Restart the final review and voting
>
>Hello Katata-san,
>
>Before re-start voting, please answer my following question dated 06 Jan.
>2006.
>
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Harry Ai
>VEBU
>Panasonic AVC Networks Company
>Matsushita/Panasonic
>Osaka, Japan
>
>
>--- Start of the original message -------------------------------------
>>From: Takaharu Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>
>>To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
>>Cc: t10 at t10.org
>>Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:27:45 +0900
>>Subject: Re: Stop voting and send your opinion for CORE feature V2
>>
>>Hello Katata-san,
>>
>>Thank you very much for your comments on my questions. Almost all of my
>>questions become clear. But I would like to confirm one thing.
>>
>>
>>><Ans2>
>>>Reduced Border-out with SMA will be allocated at NWA.
>>
>>I understand this answer means that the drive MUST move the location of
>>SMA to the inner part of the disc upon finalizing even if the SMA has
>>already specified as follows.
>>
>> <- LO -> <--- MA --->
>>L1 LLLLLLLLLL######-----------------------------------------------------
>>L0 LLLLLLLL########-----------------------------------------------------
>> <- LI -> ^ ^
>> NWA Specified SMA
>> start address
>>
>> | Finalization
>> v
>>
>> <- LO -> <- SMA -> <--- MA --->
>>L1 LLLLLLLLLL######BBMMMMMMM--------------------------------------------
>>L0 LLLLLLLL########BBMMMMMMM--------------------------------------------
>> <- LI -> ^ ^
>> SMA start Specified SMA
>> address start address
>>
>> where L:Lead-in or Lead-out
>> #:Recorded portion
>> M:Shifted Middle area
>> B:Border-out or Superficial Border-out
>> -:Unrecorded portion
>>
>>
>>Does this a mandatory function or optional? Is it allowed to record the
>>SMA at the requested location and pad the area between the NWA and the
>>SMA by all zero data?
>>
>> <- LO -> <- SMA -> <--- MA --->
>>L1 LLLLLLLLLL######PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPBBMMMMMMM-------------------------
>>L0 LLLLLLLL########PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPBBMMMMMMM-------------------------
>> <- LI -> ^ ^
>> NWA Specified SMA
>> start address
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
----------------- End of the original message -----------------
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10
mailing list