QA Action Item: ASCQ
David Burg
dburg at nero.com
Mon Jan 31 08:35:14 PST 2005
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* David Burg <dburg at nero.com>
*
Hi all,
I feel confused by all existing error codes. I favor the new error code
proposal
|from Katata-san.
Best regards,
David Burg
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
Software Development
Nero AG
Im Stoeckmaedle 18
76307 Karlsbad email: dburg at nero.com
Germany http://www.nero.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quoting keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp:
> Hi all,
> Here is my action item about ASCQ of Write command crossing Layer Jump
> point.
>
> Question:
> When single Write command is issued crossing the layer jump address, what
> error code shall be reported?
>
> Proposals:
> Existing Error Code
> 5/21/00: LOGICAL BLOCK ADDRESS OUT OF RANGE
> This shows that start address is correct, but range is not correct.
> 5/21/02: INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE
> This shows that start address may not be correct, and range may not
> be correct.
> 5/24/00: INVALID FIELD IN CDB
> This shows that some field in CDB is not correct. What?
> 3/0C/07: WRITE ERROR. RECOVERY NEEDED
> This shows that something is wrong. How to recover?
> New Error Code
> 5/21/03: INVALID RANGE FOR WRITE
> Creating new error code is too much?
>
> Which do you favor?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Keiji Katata
> PIONEER CORP.
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10
mailing list