QA Action Item: ASCQ

David Burg dburg at nero.com
Mon Jan 31 08:35:14 PST 2005


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* David Burg <dburg at nero.com>
*
Hi all,

I feel confused by all existing error codes. I favor the new error code 
proposal
|from Katata-san.

Best regards,

David Burg
-

----------------------------------------------------------------
Software Development

Nero AG
Im Stoeckmaedle 18
76307 Karlsbad        email: dburg at nero.com
Germany               http://www.nero.com
----------------------------------------------------------------

Quoting keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp:

> Hi all,
> Here is my action item about ASCQ of Write command crossing Layer Jump
> point.
>
> Question:
> When single Write command is issued crossing the layer jump address, what
> error code shall be reported?
>
> Proposals:
>  Existing Error Code
>       5/21/00: LOGICAL BLOCK ADDRESS OUT OF RANGE
>       This shows that start address is correct, but range is not correct.
>       5/21/02: INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE
>       This shows that start address may not be correct, and range may not
> be correct.
>       5/24/00: INVALID FIELD IN CDB
>       This shows that some field in CDB is not correct. What?
>       3/0C/07: WRITE ERROR. RECOVERY NEEDED
>       This shows that something is wrong. How to recover?
>  New Error Code
>       5/21/03:  INVALID RANGE FOR WRITE
>       Creating new error code is too much?
>
> Which do you favor?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Keiji Katata
> PIONEER CORP.


*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org





More information about the T10 mailing list