Comments about "host responsibility"

[keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
*

Hi David,

Yes, any implementation that uses Layer Jump needs to take care Layer Jump.

People think that UDF VAT may be applied to Incremental Recording mode of
Dual-R, may not be applied to Layer Jump recording mode.
Some UDF VAT implementation use SAO writing actually. In this case, the
implementation provides data append capability after Border closing (to be
readable by ROM device that support reading of dual-r multi-border).

I may not understand your case. "incremental packet recording on layer jump
DL DVD-R", what kind of application or implementation do you assume?

Best regards,

Keiji Katata
PIONEER CORP.





"David Burg" <dburg at nero.com>@avc-pioneer.com on 2005/01/28 17:30:24

mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(J

$BAw?.<T(J:     owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com




$B08 at h(J:  <mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com>
cc:    <T10 at t10.org>
bcc:
$B7oL>(J:  RE: Comments about "host responsibility"

Dear Katata-san,

What about UDF 'VAT' recording on Dual Layer DVD-R, or more generally,
incremental packet recording on layer jump DL DVD-R?

I think this is also an issue, additionally to the SAO issue you mentioned.

Best regards,

David Burg

----------------------------------------------------------------
David Burg
Software Development,
InCD and Low Level Drivers Project Leader

Nero AG               phone: +49 (0)7248 911 862 (room line) Internal VoIP
-363
Im Stoeckmaedle 18    fax:   +49 (0)7248 928 299
76307 Karlsbad        email: dburg at nero.com
Germany               http://www.nero.com
----------------------------------------------------------------







*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org