mmcr403 tupo - hex of READ op again in dispute

Pat LaVarre p.lavarre at IEEE.org
Thu Apr 15 10:24:35 PDT 2004


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre at ieee.org>
*
> --- http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/mmc4/mmc4r03.pdf
>
> 5.3.9 DVD Read Feature (001Fh) ...
> Table 94 -- DVD READ Feature Commands \...
> 18h ... READ(10) ... 6.19 ...
> ...
> 6.19 READ (10) Command ...
> Table 333 -- Features Associated ...
> ... 001Fh ... DVD Read ...
> ...
> ---
>
> I claim that 18h ishave published 18h.

Ironic.  I see that garbled sentence echoed, and I regret that you did  
too, but my machine assisted memory remembers me having typed the  
radically distinct text:

I claim that 18h is a tupographical error.  We mean to say 28h, but we  
have published 18h.

> In this instance, the plain hex is incorrect, only the natural  
> language is correct.

Agreed?

Pat LaVarre
https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2004-April/ 
000213.html

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list