SBP-3 isochronous data transfer greater than 64 kiB

Andy Green at
Fri Jul 25 01:26:05 PDT 2003

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* Andy Green < at>
Peter Johansson wrote:
> On May 12, Andy Green noted that changes to isochronous ORBs discussed 
> and agreed by the working group back in February, 2003, had not been 
> included in SBP-3 Revision 4. T10/03-265r0 
> ( proposes to remedy this 
> by modifying the SBP-3 working draft and requesting T10 to initiate a 
> second public review.
> Please comment on the reflector; since we are no longer meeting 
> face-to-face, it's important for the working group's opinion to be 
> reported to T10. Timely feedback is important, as I am obligated to 
> publish SBP-3 Revision 4a on the T10 web site by August 27 if a vote is 
> to be taken at the T10 plenary September 11.
> If the proposed changes are adopted, the only anticipated effect on the 
> draft standard is a delay in its official publication until later this 
> year. This is necessary to accommodate a second public review. I base my 
> opinion on the fact that no comments were received during initial public 
> review.


That's great news - I think this minor change makes the isoc model much more 
appealing to implementers.
I've read the changes and they look good to me.


* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list