MMC vs Mt.Fuji on FORMAT UNIT command
ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com
Fri Jan 10 01:09:02 PST 2003
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Harry Ai <ai.takaharu at jp.panasonic.com>
Hello MMC people and Mt.Fuji people,
We find one inconsistency between MMC standard and Mt.Fuji specification.
That is the handling of the Number of Blocks field value and Type Dependent
Parameter field value in FORMAT UNIT command with Format type=00h.
In Mt.Fuji, the value of those fields is limited to the one reported by
READ FORMAT CAPACITIES command, i.e. the value shall be selected from one
of the Formattable Capacity Descroptors reported.
But in MMC2, 3 and 4, there is no such a limitation.
According to our servay, we could not find a C/DVD-R/RW drive which
implemented this limitation. In addition to that, the MMCTest software in
HCT11.0 of Microsoft specifies those fields other than the value reported
by Formattable Capacity Descroptors during CD-RW function testing.
On the other hand, DVD-RAM drives implement it.
One of the idea to solve this problem is to change the definition in both
MMC and Mt.Fuji to that the limitation is applied only to the DVD-RAM disc.
Takaharu (Harry) Ai
Panasonic AVC Network Communications
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10