Obsolete untagged tasks proposal

Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) elliott at hp.com
Thu Aug 7 00:53:06 PDT 2003


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <elliott at hp.com>
*
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C35CB8.EFF11A26
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

03-271r0 has been posted to  <http://www.t10.org/new.htm>
http://www.t10.org/new.htm for discussion in the September CAP meeting.
This proposes obsoleting untagged tasks in SAM-3 and SPC-3.

In SAM-2, transport protocols were allowed to not support untagged
tasks.  SRP, SPI-4 information units, and SAS have all gone ahead and
done so.  iSCSI and FCP, on the other hand, put in special provisions =
to
specify "untagged" via their task attribute fields.  This would =
obsolete
the perceived need for that.

---=20
Rob Elliott, HP Server Storage=20
elliott at hp.com=20


------_=_NextPart_001_01C35CB8.EFF11A26
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

 Obsolete untagged tasks proposal 03-271r0 has been posted to http://www.t10.org/new.htm for discussion in the September CAP meeting.  This = proposes obsoleting untagged tasks in SAM-3 and SPC-3. In SAM-2, transport protocols were = allowed to not support untagged tasks.  SRP, SPI-4 information = units, and SAS have all gone ahead and done so.  iSCSI and FCP, on = the other hand, put in special provisions to specify = ;untagged; via their task attribute fields.  This would = obsolete the perceived need for that. --- 
Rob Elliott, HP Server Storage 
elliott at hp.com 
------_=_NextPart_001_01C35CB8.EFF11A26--




More information about the T10 mailing list