[t10] op x23 of PDT x00 practically not vendor-specific

David Dillard david.dillard at veritas.com
Tue Apr 1 16:09:00 PST 2003


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* David Dillard <david.dillard at veritas.com>
*
You would seem to be correct.  See http://www.t10.org/lists/op-alph.htm



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat LaVarre [mailto:LAVARRE at iomega.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:11 PM
> To: t10 at t10.org
> Subject: [t10] op x23 of PDT x00 practically not vendor-specific
> 
> 
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
> * "Pat LaVarre" <LAVARRE at iomega.com>
> *
> http://www.t10.org/scsi-3.htm 
> ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/drafts/sbc2/sbc2r08.pdf
> 
> "The following operation codes are vendor-specific:
> 02h, 05h, 06h, 09h, 0Ch, 0Dh, 0Eh, 0Fh, 10h, 11h,
> 13h, 14h, 19h, 20h, 21h, 22h, 23h, 24h, 26h, 27h,
> 29h, 2Ch, 2Dh, and C0h through FFh."
> 
> Except for op x23 we're just kidding.  "Everybody
> knows" RMB PDT x00 often needs op x23 to mean Read
> Format Capacities, as in the SFF 8070i Compaq LS-120 specification.
> 
> Have we (T10) ever discussed acknowledging this fact in SBC?
> 
> Should we?
> 
> Cluelessly, curiously, thankfully yours, Pat LaVarre
> 
> *
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
> 
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list