Use of READ POSITION/LOCATE
Paul.A.Suhler at seagate.com
Paul.A.Suhler at seagate.com
Mon Jul 22 19:31:13 PDT 2002
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Paul.A.Suhler at seagate.com
*
I ran this past a system vendor, who said:
We are firmly in the camp strongly in support of the transport layer
error recovery protocols.
He recommends asking this of the host vendors. He's passed his comments to
his T10 rep, who may choose to respond directly with more detail on their
reasons.
Cheers,
Paul
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Paul Suhler
Seagate Removable Storage Solutions
1650 Sunflower Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
"Dave
Peterson" To: "MCCARTHY,JOHN \(HP-Greeley,ex1\)" <jmccarthy at hp.com>,
<dap at cisco.co <snia-backup at snia.org>
m> cc: "'Mallikarjun'" <cbm at rose.hp.com>
Subject: RE: Use of READ POSITION/LOCATE
07/22/02
01:31 PM
Howdy All,
I have received responses from an excellent snapshot of the vendors
actually
involved in the tape realm (backup apps, drive vendors). To summarize, READ
POSITION and LOCATE are in wide use today. Not a single vendor indicated
that they do not support/use READ POSITION, while only one vendor indicated
that they do not use LOCATE (and this seems to be a non-mainstream case).
Additionally, devices that do not support these commands (i.e., legacy
devices) are a rare breed and of the parallel SCSI ilk.
This further acknowledges my belief that the usefulness for transport level
error detection and recovery (specifically for tape devices) has run its
course...dap
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10
mailing list