Clearing effects of logouts on different protocols

Mallikarjun C. cbm at rose.hp.com
Sat Feb 23 17:05:11 PST 2002


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Mallikarjun C." <cbm at rose.hp.com>
*
Rob,

Can you please comment if you are implying that (Reserve-Release
managed)  reservations are not used by software? Or, software is 
fine with FCP-like behavior, and so isn't likely to ever use the mode page?

Thanks.

Mallikarjun

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Rob Haydt 
To: t10 at t10.org 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: Clearing effects of logouts on different protocols


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Rob Haydt" <robhay at windows.microsoft.com>
*
iScsi and SRP should clear.

Don't add a mode page. Why would anyone want to implement this if
software isn't going to use it?

-rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Elliott, Robert [mailto:Robert.Elliott at COMPAQ.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:50 AM
To: t10 at t10.org
Subject: Clearing effects of logouts on different protocols

<misc. text removed>

The questions are:
* should iSCSI clear or not?
* should SRP clear or not?
* should we add a control mode page bit to allow not clearing?
* should mode pages/log pages/etc. all be handled the same?

---

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list