Comments to 02-489r0

rod.wideman at rod.wideman at
Wed Dec 11 16:12:22 PST 2002

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* rod.wideman at
Thanks for the comments, Michael.

I agree with all of them as stated, except the last one regarding firmware
upgrade and tape motion status.  Since the value is relevant to "Tape Motion
Status" I believe it applies to and implies just that - there is a tape in
use and its current usage is updating firmware.

Having said that though, since it is unlikely that tape remains in motion
throughout the entire duration of the update, I wonder if it would be better
to eliminate altogether this one as a tape motion status, and as Michael
suggests, provide a separate indication of updating firmware.  If it's from
tape, that portion of the process would be reflected by a status of Reading.

If we can gain some consensus on these comments, I can update to an r1
possibly by next call.


-----Original Message-----
From: BANTHER,MICHAEL (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)
[mailto:michael_banther at]
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Alfred Missbrenner (E-mail); Joe Breher (E-mail); Kevin Butt
(E-mail); Lee Jesionowski (E-mail); Paul Entzel (E-mail); Paul Suhler
(E-mail); Robert Griswold (E-mail); Rod Wideman (E-mail); Steve Hellwege
(E-mail); Susan Gray (E-mail); Tuong Vu (E-mail)
Cc: T10 Reflector (E-mail)
Subject: Comments to 02-489r0


I've added comments on the ADI Very High Frequency log page to the attached

Michael Banther
Hewlett-Packard Company 

* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list