Additional items for special review in FCP-2 revision 6

Jim.Coomes at seagate.com Jim.Coomes at seagate.com
Thu Feb 15 16:16:24 PST 2001


*
* From the fc reflector, posted by:
* Jim.Coomes at seagate.com
*

Bob,

Several places in your responses to the additional items for review in
FCP-2 you suggest sending P_RJT in response to FCP_IUs with no image pair.
This option is not available in Class 3. Another option that was discussed
in the Jan meeting was PRLO. Is this option acceptable?

Jim





More information about the T10 mailing list