An SBC-2 question regarding persistent reservation.

Gene.Milligan at Gene.Milligan at
Mon Aug 21 14:46:36 PDT 2000

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* Gene.Milligan at

<<Do you agree that such an implementation would be illegal if the second
requirement is removed?>>

     No. But in any case I was not proposing that the requirement be
removed. I was wondering if the wording meant that it had to be checked
again the instant before writing the media or if it meant that handling
Writes like Reads was also OK.

<<Do you agree that making this implementation illegal this is

     I don't know but I am not proposing to make it illegal and also not


* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list