SPI-3 technical clarification

[gop at us.ibm.com]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* gop at us.ibm.com
*
Sriram,
You are correct there is an error and it was not corrected in rev 11. I
have noted this and it should get fixed in rev 12. The same error occurs in
step 3 of the next list in that section. In both cases the term 'negation'
should be 'assertion'.
Thanks for pointing this out.

Bye for now,
George Penokie

Dept Z9V  114-2 N212
E-Mail:    gop at us.ibm.com
Internal:  553-5208
External: 507-253-5208   FAX: 507-253-2880



Sriram Srinivasan <srirams at propwash.co.lsil.com> on 11/29/99 02:58:34 PM

Please respond to Sriram Srinivasan <srirams at propwash.co.lsil.com>

To:   t10 at t10.org
cc:
Subject:  SPI-3 technical clarification




* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Sriram Srinivasan <srirams at propwash.co.lsil.com>
*
     I have a question reg. subclause 10.5.2.2.2.1 (data group pad field
and
pCRC field transfer to initiator)

     In step 3) of this subclause, it states the following:

     *********

     3) wait at least the longer of a pCRC transmit setup time from the
        <<NEGATION>> of P_CRCA or a transmit setup time from DB(15-0) being
        driven with valid pad data;

     *********

     Shouldn't the word in the angled brackets read ASSERTION instead of
NEGATION?  Please clarify.

     Thanx,
     Sriram


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Sriram Srinivasan,                Sriram.Srinivasan at lsil.com
ASIC Design Engineer, LSI Logic,       Phone : (970) 206 5847
2001 Danfield Ct., Ft. Collins, CO 80525    FAX   : (970) 206 5244
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org



*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org