SAM requirements for ACA on unsupported logical unit?

Gene_Milligan at Gene_Milligan at
Mon Nov 15 14:14:24 PST 1999

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* Gene_Milligan at
<<Have I missed something, or does the spec need clarification to state that
an ACA shall not be established for an unsupported or unattached logical
unit? >>

     I think you have missed one thing or just left it out in your description.
You are correct that NACA=1 indicates problems with the command should create an
ACA. But NACA=1 does not mean don't create an ACA exactly, it means create a CA
if there is a problem with the command.


* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list