Draft Minutes of SPI-3 Working Group - March 9, 1999

Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
Wed Mar 17 10:49:17 PST 1999

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
After humbly and graciously thanking the secretary for the essentially
thankless labor, could we in the future save space by omitting useless
statements like "and eventually agreed" from the minutes?

<<Larry Lamers reviewed reported objections to proposed changes to the
packetized protocol that would eliminate the known-length feature of the
packetized protocol. >>

     I think some wires got crossed. Perhaps "Larry Lamers reviewed
motivation for proposed changes to the packetized protocol that would
enhance flow control."

<<by added a CRC Interval>>

     Change to "by adding a CRC Interval" or to "by an added CRC Interval"

<<The group agreed to defer a SPI-3 review to the next meeting.

Chair's note:  George Penokie was able to begin the review process after
the SCSI working group meeting, which ended earlier than expected.>>

     I think all of this should be replaced with "Part of the draft was
reviewed to confirm changes and to resolve Editor's Notes. The next working
group is targeted to put a priority on the draft review."


* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com

More information about the T10 mailing list