Conference call on non-data phase protection

[gop at us.ibm.com]

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* gop at us.ibm.com
*
March 1 works but 2/22 does not, 2/22 is during the FC plugfest.

Bye for now,
George Penokie

Dept EGB  114-2 N212
E-Mail:    gop at us.ibm.com
Internal:  553-5208
External: 507-253-5208   FAX: 507-253-5208




Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com on 02/09/99 10:15:46 AM

To:   Jim McGrath <Jim.McGrath at quantum.com>
cc:   "'t10 at Symbios.COM'" <t10 at Symbios.COM> (bcc: George
      Penokie/Rochester/IBM)
Subject:  Re: Conference call on non-data phase protection





* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
*
The proposed date for the telecon is free and clear and we will have two
locations participating. I agree there are dates that could be difficult.
But do you think you could move it up to 2/22/99 to allow more time before
the T10 meeting week? One week seems short for recycle and reaction. If not
2/22/99 please stick with the proposed 3/1 date.

You invited private replies but in case you were able to accommodate the
earlier date I wanted to float it before the T10 folks and ask all to avoid
the 2/23 through 2/26 T13 dates as you have proposed.

Thanks,

Gene

To:       "'t10 at Symbios.COM'" <t10 at Symbios.COM>
cc:        (bcc: Gene Milligan)
From:     Jim McGrath <Jim.McGrath at quantum.com> @ INTERNET
Date:     02/08/99 10:54:50 PM GMT
Subject:  Conference call on non-data phase protection




* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* Jim McGrath <Jim.McGrath at quantum.com>
*

I would like to hold a conference call on this topic (a follow up to the
discussion we had at the T10 meeting).  Proposed date and time:

          Monday, March 1, 10am - noon PST

I will provide a written proposal we can examine and discuss.  My goal is
to
provide this document earlier, so that those of you who wish to engage in
preliminary email conversation will be able to do so.  The goal of the con
call is to make any generally agreed upon changes, and to identify
significant issues (i.e. those where we have no such agreement) before the
March T10 meeting.  If you remember, this is the same procedure we used on
the DT CRC proposal last fall, and our advanced work paid off well when the
meeting week commenced.

The reason this is as late as March 1 is that some key people are on
vacation/T13 duty during the next few weeks - this is the earliest time I
could identify as generally available.  It will still give me adequate time
to revise the proposal for the T10 week, and allow people time for a final
read from their implementers before we begin in Harrisburg.  If you have a
problem with the date/time, then please email back to me (you don't have to
reply to the entire T10 group) with your issue and suggested alternatives,
and I will try and reschedule.

I will follow up this email with a later one on the exact logistics (phone
number), and then the actual proposal (which I'll ask John to post to the
web site as well).

Jim



*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com



*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com



*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com