Draft minutes of SPI-3 Working Group - 9/15/98
Jim.McGrath at quantum.com
Mon Sep 28 15:45:08 PDT 1998
* From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* Jim McGrath <Jim.McGrath at quantum.com>
On the two phases, the 98-177r6, which the plenary approved, had changed to
SPI-3 that removed the use of the reserved phases for packetized. Rather
than packetized phases, the new term is packetized protocol. Note that this
has been in the document from the very first revision.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Lohmeyer [SMTP:lohmeyer at ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 1998 1:04 PM
> To: Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
> Cc: t10 at Symbios.COM
> Subject: Re: Draft minutes of SPI-3 Working Group - 9/15/98
> * From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
> * John Lohmeyer <lohmeyer at ix.netcom.com>
> I have included your comments in rev 1 of the SPI-3 minutes. Your email
> included some questions that I would like to respond to here:
> >Regarding 4.12.
> > The minutes are correct and no change is necessary. But for this
> >at the November meeting I want to point out that we have now accepted
> >SPI-3 two proposals for the use of the previously reserved two SCSI bus
> >phases. A recommendation is needed to remove this conflict. I suspect the
> >editor intends to or may already have removed the conflict but I think
> >there should be a recorded vote. If I recall incorrectly please provide a
> >pointer to the appropriate minutes.
> I believe George plans to fix this conflict in rev 1. I know we discussed
> how this could be accomplished at the May T10 meetings, but I am pretty
> sure no motions were taken. Assuming George does indeed fix the problem
> rev 1, I would argue that a motion accepting rev 1 as the working draft
> SPI-3 would be sufficient. I agree that we do need to clear up this
> conflict ASAP.
> >Regarding 4.15
> ><<A straw poll favored further consideration of the proposal 11:6.>>
> > Is this correct? I recalled that there was a vote sufficient to
> >motivate the proposer to abandon the proposal.
> The abandonment came the next day.
> John Lohmeyer Email: lohmeyer at ix.netcom.com
> LSI Logic Corp. Voice: +1-719-533-7560
> 4420 ArrowsWest Dr. Fax: +1-719-533-7036
> Colo Spgs, CO 80907 BBS: +1-719-533-7950
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com
More information about the T10