SPC-2 Changes complementary to RBC

[PJohansson at aol.com]

* From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* PJohansson at aol.com
*
In a message dated 97-10-13 14:39:47 EDT, ROWEBER at acm.org writes:

<<I am not comfortable with linking Request Sense support to the protocol. I
think we should consider something like:>>

Ralph, your wording (with the one exception of "...totally..." already noted
by Ed Gardner) is impeccable, as usual.

BUT, would you, please, provide something more concrete than an assertion of
discomfort when you say T10 shouldn't link REQUEST SENSE support to the
transport protocol. As far as I can determine you have said the same thing in
words that are likely to be less than transparent to many readers.

Perhaps a counter-example of when it's NOT appropriate to link the two would
be helpful. I'm ready to have my opinion changed.

Peter Johansson

Congruent Software, Inc.
3998 Whittle Avenue
Oakland, CA  94602

(510) 531-5472
(510) 531-2942 FAX

pjohansson at aol.com

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com