FW: Re 2: Project Proposal for SCSI-4 Parallel Interface - 3 (SPI -3) Physical & Protocol Layers

[Hallam, Ken J]

* From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* "Hallam, Ken J" <Ken.Hallam at unisys.com>
*
Penultimate eh? If this was the next-to-last comment must we wait for
your final comment?

> ----------
> From: 	Gene Milligan[SMTP:Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com]
> Sent: 	Thursday, October 16, 1997 8:53 AM
> To: 	t10
> Subject: 	Re 2: Project Proposal for SCSI-4 Parallel Interface - 3
> (SPI-3) Physical & Protocol Layers
> 
> * From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
> * Gene Milligan <Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com>
> *
> I omitted the penultimate comment in my diatribe on why SCSI rather
> than 
> SCSI-4. If T10 were to make a step to SCSI-4 it should be one that
> embraces the 
> entire SCSI family not just one of the transports.
> 
> Gene
> *
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com
> 
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com