Re 2: Fw: Clarification of Web Distribution of Standards (Draft orApproved)

Gene Milligan Gene_Milligan at
Sat Oct 11 20:02:09 PDT 1997

* From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* Gene Milligan <Gene_Milligan at>
Regarding ECMA Ed wrote:
<<Gee, if changing affiliation meant we had to meet in Geneva once a year,
maybe it has other advantages :-)>>

 As a European manufacturer we would be eligible but the membership fee is 
significant. Certainly with the membership fees so high it is practical to not 
charge for the publications. But rather than have high fees for the few that 
are eligible, I think Johns suggestion for somewhat higher fees for the many 
that wish to participate actively is better. I suggest that those looking 
towards ECMA not only look at document availability but also look at 
participation rules and fees.

* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list