clarification comments on T10/97-155R1.TXT
Doug Hagerman, Digital Equipment, 508-841-2145, Flames to /dev/null 27-Mar-1997 1019
hagerman at starch.enet.dec.com
Thu Mar 27 07:12:16 PST 1997
* From the SCSI Reflector (scsi at symbios.com), posted by:
* "Doug Hagerman, Digital Equipment, 508-841-2145, Flames to /dev/null 27-Mar-1997 1019" <hagerman at starch.ENET.dec.com>
Here are a couple of minor clarifications of 155r1.txt.
In paragraph a.) I said: "If a tape command or data transfer
fails on the interconnect, the recovery requires more than simply
the reissuance of the command." This should be read in the context
of "If the current disk-oriented protocol is used, which requires
the reissuance of a new command as the recovery process, then
there is a problem for tape devices because:... "
In paragraph 4. I said: "This can be though of as an FCP ACK 1."
I was thinking in terms of "it's an acknowledgement of the
protocol data unit appropriate to the level of the protocol that's
doing the acknowledgement", which in this case is a sequence.
Another way of wording it would be to call it an ACK 0, but that's
also confusing. In the next version of this I think I'll just
say that it's a per-sequence acknowledgement and leave out any
reference to ACK 0 or ACK 1.
* For SCSI Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info scsi' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com
More information about the T10