Additions to ESI working group action items.
Bob Snively
Bob.Snively at Eng.Sun.COM
Fri Mar 8 08:48:56 PST 1996
* From the SCSI Reflector, posted by:
* Bob.Snively at Eng.Sun.COM (Bob Snively)
*
* From the SCSI Reflector, posted by:
* Bob.Snively at Eng.Sun.COM (Bob Snively)
*
To: Distribution
From: Bob Snively
Date: March 8, 1996
Subject: Additional inputs to the ESI process
Using the technical content of the minutes of the ESI adhoc
meeting, new inputs and modifications that have been suggested and
sound reasonable are interspersed in the proper place.
Those new inputs and modifications that have been suggested, but
require significant consideration, are placed at the end in the
"issues to be considered" section.
Contributions have been received from:
AMalik at corp.adaptec.com
GFRAZIER at AUSVM6.VNET.IBM.COM
>
>NEW INPUTS TO THE DOCUMENT
>
>
17) A Malik of Adaptec has suggested the possibility of
installing a "communication element", which would enable
and disable and provide status for ethernet and serial
port interconnects.
18) Giles Frazier of IBM indicates that there is no reference
between the elements and the physical configuration within
the system. It was implicit that this is related to the
element ordering in the list, but this will now be made
explicit.
>
>
>NEW FUNCTIONALITY ASSOCIATED WITH OTHER ELEMENTS
>
>1) New Element Definitions
>
> Global Element
> Sets global indicators to four levels of warning/failure.
>
> Language Element
> Language
> Character Encoding
>
> Voltage Sensor Element
> Over Voltage
> Under Voltage
> Actual Voltage (16 bits, millivolts, 2's complement)
>
> Current Sensor Element
> Over Current
> Under Current?
> (Note that no well designed box will fail
> in the presence of an undercurrent.)
> Actual Current (16 bits, milliamps, 2's complement)
>
> SCSI Target Port Element
>
> SCSI Initiator Port Element
Communications Port Element
>
>
Issues to be resolved:
1) A Malik of Adaptec has suggested that a MIB/MIF be defined for
for enclosure services so that comparable function can also
be performed across a network interface. While this is an
interesting idea, and while the content of a MIB should certainly
be a correct reflection of the ESI information, that
was not the intent of this particular project and should
be considered as a separate project.
More information about the T10
mailing list