Question on Synchronous data transfer
PAT LaVARRE (PAT LAVARRE)
LAVARRE at iomega.com
Mon Mar 4 10:44:00 PST 1996
* From the SCSI Reflector, posted by:
* PAT LaVARRE (PAT LAVARRE) <LAVARRE at IOMEGA.COM>
> ... negative offset ...
Originally undocumented or permanently so?
Do we have a possible SCSI extension here?
Even SCSI-III material? Does anybody _want_
to carry this forward?
How might I go about finding out how the
1989 QLogic WD33C9x worked?
): My shipping product chokes and dies if
ever it sees a negative offset. On the
other hand, we whip out REQ's fairly quickly
- and I suppose in the end we could just
tell people not to disable synchronous
negotiation in order to talk to a 1989
QLogic WD33C9x. :(
More information about the T10