Proposed control mechanism for reserved handling
jlohmeye at ncr-mpd.FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM
Fri Jun 10 14:08:29 PDT 1994
"Gerry Houlder wrote:"
> I think the proposal is reasonable, but I would not like to see the DRC bit
> sandwiched into the AEN controls in byte 4.
> I suggest using byte 2, bit 7.
I do not care where the bit goes. Byte 2, bit 7 is fine with me. Gene
Milligan also sent me an email on this topic (which didn't go to the reflector,
I think). He suggested byte 4, bit 5 for similar reasons. Your suggestion
really gets DRC out of the way.
I looked through the X3T9.2 document register when I prepared the proposal
and didn't find any matches on 'control', so I missed the accepted proposals.
(No, I didn't check George's document -- I was in a hurry and knew I'd get
corrected if I missed anything :-)
> ... I know this process is
> complicated by the fact that there is no SCSI-3 document that pulls all this
Amen! I plan to introduce a motion withdrawing the SBC project if we do
not get a volunteer to edit the document soon.
John Lohmeyer E-Mail: John.Lohmeyer at FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM
NCR Microelectronics Voice: 719-573-3362
1635 Aeroplaza Dr. Fax: 719-597-8225
Colo Spgs, CO 80916 SCSI BBS: 719-574-0424 300--14400 baud
More information about the T10