Proposed control mechanism for reserved handling

Gerry Houlder Gerry_Houlder at
Mon Jun 6 10:08:06 PDT 1994

I think the proposal is reasonable, but I would not like to see the DRC bit
sandwiched into the AEN controls in byte 4.
I suggest using byte 2, bit 7. I know of an accepted proposal that adds another
logging control in byte 2, bit 1 but nothing else in byte 2. There was also a
proposal accepted (I think it was accepted, written by Gene Milligan) that
added an ARC bit and some other things. Shouldn't your proposal be updated to
include these other items, in the interest of accuracy? I know this process is
complicated by the fact that there is no SCSI-3 document that pulls all this
Gerry Houlder -- Gerry_Houlder at
Seagate Technology   -   920 Disc Drive   -   Scotts Valley, CA 95066 USA
Main Phone 408-438-6550   -   Email Problems postmaster at
Technical Support: BBS 408-438-8771  Fax 408-438-8137  Voice 408-438-8222  

### OGATE Version 8 message trace and attachment information:
### MsgFileName: m:\mgate\outbound\76.MSG
### Org Date:    06-06-94 10:01:54 AM
### From:        Gerry Houlder at SEAGATE
### To:          scsi @ WichitaKS.NCR.COM @ internet
### Subject:     RE: Proposed control mechanism for reserved handling
### Attachments: none

More information about the T10 mailing list