Comments on Ultra SCSI
jlohmeye at ncr-mpd.FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM
Mon Feb 14 08:22:25 PST 1994
"Steve Finch wrote:"
> Is Ultra SCSI for differential only? I think it will have to be, as
> single ended has significant problems.
.... meat deleted ....
> Out of curiosity, is anyone out there coming to the March 3 Ultra SCSI
> meeting thinking this idea is a done deal?
Yeah, I think that Ultra SCSI is easier to do as a differential-only
solution. However, I think it might be hard to explain this to the 80%+
single-ended SCSI market. There are a couple possibilities regarding
1. Don't allow it.
2. Restrict it (e.g., 15 Mrep/sec or controlled environment where slew
rates can be faster)
By the way, I hope no one is planning to come to the Ultra SCSI meeting
on March 3rd...unless I missed a change in date, Jim McGrath announced
this meeting for May 2nd, but meant March 2nd. What day is it really?!?
And what times?
John Lohmeyer E-Mail: John.Lohmeyer at FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM
NCR Microelectronics Voice: 719-573-3362
1635 Aeroplaza Dr. Fax: 719-597-8225
Colo Spgs, CO 80916 SCSI BBS: 719-574-0424 300--14400 baud
More information about the T10