ANOTHER BIT IN INQUIRY DATA
GFRAZIER at ausvm6.vnet.ibm.com
GFRAZIER at ausvm6.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Aug 25 07:11:45 PDT 1994
John Lohmeyer asked:
Should we add a bit to the INQUIRY Data to say
the target supports Fast-20 to avoid any nasty surprises?
Answer:
I hope we don't need to. Present initiator adapters I know about handle
synchronous negotiations without involvement of the system software.
These adapters also do not read the INQUIRY data. If the bit is put
in the INQUIRY data, therefore, the adapter will either a) need help
in synchronous negotiations from the system (i.e. to tell it what
transfer period to use) or b) it will have to read the INQUIRY data
itself (to find out what transfer period to use).
Choice a) will add complexity to system software and choice b) will
add complexity to the adapter. Neither choice is desireable.
Therefore I hope that either 1) we find that sending a current device
a 48ns and 24ns transfer period request is an easily recoverable "error",
or b) someone finds a way to solve the problem without adding complexity
to adapters or system software.
Giles Frazier
IBM Austin
gfrazier at ausvm6.vnet.ibm.com
More information about the T10
mailing list