QErr bit and Multi-Initiator
Gene Milligan
Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
Fri Aug 19 07:17:03 PDT 1994
>Are you suggesting that the target should keep track of whether this contingent
>allegiance is a result of "real errors from real I/O processing" verses a unit
>attention, and then perform the QErr function only on "real errors"? If I
>misread your comments, please correct me. If I understood you, I disagree.
>Charles Binford
No. Just suggesting the for the QErr function you should keep track of whether
the I/O was in the Task Set prior to the CA.
Gene Milligan
--
Gene Milligan -- Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seagate Technology - 920 Disc Drive - Scotts Valley, CA 95066 USA
Main Phone 408-438-6550 - Email Problems postmaster at notes.seagate.com
Technical Support: BBS 408-438-8771 Fax 408-438-8137 Voice 408-438-8222
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
### OGATE Version 8 message trace and attachment information:
### MsgFileName: m:\mgate\outbound\342.MSG
### Org Date: 08-19-94 07:16:42 AM
### From: Gene Milligan at SEAGATE
### To: scsi @ wichitaks.ncr.com @ internet
### Subject: Re: QErr bit and Multi-Initiator
### Attachments: none
More information about the T10
mailing list