[T10] SPL-4 - Simplified text change resolution for public letter ballot comment 16-253r1

Tim Symons tim.symons at microsemi.com
Mon Nov 21 15:34:36 PST 2016


FYI,

I've uploaded a proposal for  a simplified way to fix the issue where the BREAK response is technically breaking the rule in the standard, and allows for legacy operation. It also keeps the state transition to BREAK for the PS_request states, which makes for consistency in the way that all of the state machines respond to a BREAK.

The simplified text change requires three changes of "shall" to "should" for SPL-4 ,and no change to figures.


   Agenda: CAP

Document: T10/16-280r0

     Item: SPL-4 : SL_CC6 and XL9 BREAK state requirements for BREAK response (16-280) [Symons]

      URL: http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?f=d&f=16-280r0.pdf


Regards
Tim.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.t10.org/pipermail/t10/attachments/20161121/cb35e37b/attachment.html>


More information about the T10 mailing list