[T10] discrepancy in SPC5r10

Kevin D Butt kdbutt at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 6 13:25:49 PDT 2016

One of my engineers found what looks like a discrepancy in SPC5r10

In 5.14.8 Registering and moving the reservation
in the a,b list near the end of the subclause, item b) states:
b) ignore the contents of the SCOPE and TYPE fields;

In 6.16.2 PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT service actions and parameter list 
In Table 184 ? PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT service actions and valid parameters
The REGISTER AND MOVE row list "valid" under TYPE.

We believe TYPE should be ignored.

Since text takes precedence over tables, I think this is an editorial 


Kevin D. Butt
SCSI Architect, Tape Firmware, CAMSS
T10 Standards
MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
Tel: 520-799-5280
Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.t10.org/pipermail/t10/attachments/20160706/fb8c7a52/attachment.html>

More information about the T10 mailing list