[T10] discrepancy in SPC5r10
Kevin D Butt
kdbutt at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 6 13:25:49 PDT 2016
One of my engineers found what looks like a discrepancy in SPC5r10
In 5.14.8 Registering and moving the reservation
in the a,b list near the end of the subclause, item b) states:
b) ignore the contents of the SCOPE and TYPE fields;
In 6.16.2 PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT service actions and parameter list
In Table 184 ? PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT service actions and valid parameters
The REGISTER AND MOVE row list "valid" under TYPE.
We believe TYPE should be ignored.
Since text takes precedence over tables, I think this is an editorial
Kevin D. Butt
SCSI Architect, Tape Firmware, CAMSS
MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
Email address: kdbutt at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the T10