[T10] Late letter ballot comment on SPL-4
gerry.houlder at seagate.com
Tue Aug 2 08:47:58 PDT 2016
A careful reader here at Seagate discovered that Figure 39 (in SPL-4 r9)
has 6 instances that call out "SL_IRM state machines" with in the figure.
it turns out that SL_IRM state machines do not exist. The correct
replacement for "SL_IRM" should be "SL_IR". Since this is in a figure, i
suspect this will have to be fixed in a Visio file.
I hope we can get this fixed by a new SPL-4 editor before forwarding to
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the T10