ZBC/ZAC Zone Type Code Mismatch

Neil Wanamaker Neil.Wanamaker at pmcs.com
Tue Jul 7 08:21:26 PDT 2015


Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1507072_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

This appears to have been introduced in the incorporation of f14183r8 into
ZAC, as it was correct in the proposal.
From: owner-t13 at lists.wdc.com [mailto:owner-t13 at lists.wdc.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Suhler
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:44 AM
To: t13 at t13.org; T10 E-mail Reflector (t10 at t10.org)
Subject: [T13] ZBC/ZAC Zone Type Code Mismatch
It has been brought to my attention that:
ZBC table 19 assigns:
2h	     sequential write required
3h	     sequential write preferred
ZAC table 29 assigns:
2h	     sequential write preferred
3h	     sequential write required
Oops.
I recommend that we change ZAC (and HGST will submit a letter ballot comment
to that effect).  We should try to come to an agreement and warn our
development teams.
Thanks,
Paul
Paul A. Suhler, PhD
Research Staff Member
HGST Research
paul.suhler at hgst.com
o: 949-757-3432
m: 949-241-6443
3001 Daimler St.
Santa Ana, CA 92705-5812
www.hgst.com<<a href="http://www.hgst.com/&gt">http://www.hgst.com/&gt;



More information about the T10 mailing list