Typos in SBC-4 rev. 2, table 33

Gerry Houlder gerry.houlder at seagate.com
Thu Sep 4 15:18:01 PDT 2014

Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1409045_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

O, M, and X are valid for the Type Column. R, U, V, W, Z, and n/a are valid
for the LBACT column.
I also note that the key include PI as an option, but this option is not
used in any entries of table 33. Should this item be removed from the key?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Ralph Weber <Ralph.Weber at wdc.com> wrote:
>  Apparently, the SBC-4 editor was informed about the missing cross
> references, because they are fixed in r03.
> The O vs W problem is not fixed in r03, but it is quite possible that the
> O's should be viewed editorial in nature, since they are the only two
> instances of an O in the LBACT column.
> All the best,
> .Ralph
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-t10 at t10.org [owner-t10 at t10.org] on behalf of Gerry Houlder [
> gerry.houlder at seagate.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:49 PM
> *To:* T10 Reflector
> *Subject:* Typos in SBC-4 rev. 2, table 33
>   Hi,
>  The two WRITE ATOMIC command entries that were added to table 33 are not
> correct.
>  (1) The LBACT column should have "W" instead of "O".
> (2) The Reference columns should have "5.41" and "5.42", respectively,
> instead of being blank.

More information about the T10 mailing list