Download microcode proposals

Bill Martin-SSI bill.martin at ssi.samsung.com
Tue Jun 24 14:18:43 PDT 2014


Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1406242_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Jim:
My proposals do not apply to a change in mode or MODE SPECIFIC field that go
back to a zero offset.
Bill Martin
SSD I/O Standards
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cell (408) 499-1839
From: James C Hatfield [mailto:james.c.hatfield at seagate.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:16 PM
To: Bill Martin-SSI
Cc: Kevin D Butt <kdbutt at us.ibm.com> (kdbutt at us.ibm.com); Gerry Houlder
(gerry.houlder at seagate.com); Ballard, Curtis C (HP Storage)
(curtis.ballard at hp.com); T10 Reflector; Richard Deglin-SSI
Subject: Re: Download microcode proposals
Bill (and others),
I should point out that ACS-3 defines different behaviour for one case.
ACS-3 requires that (if a a new download is started from the beginning, but
with a different mode) the previous download in process is cancelled and the
new download mode begins as if nothing bad happened. This is not a reported
error.
Note, that if the mode changes and the buffer offset is non-zero (and
consecutive from the previous segment), this is an error for ATA also.
Thank You !!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Hatfield
Seagate Technology LLC
   e-mail:  James.C.Hatfield at seagate.com
   s-mail:  389 Disc Drive;  Longmont, CO 80503 USA
   voice:  720-684-2120
   fax....: 720-684-2711
   cell...: 720-771-8914
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Bill Martin-SSI
<bill.martin at ssi.samsung.com> wrote:
There were a number of comments on 14-121r1 and 14-150r0. This email attempts
to summarize the responses and is an attempt to gain consensus prior to the
next T10 meeting.
1)	On the changing the MODE field in subsequent downloads:
a.	 Seagate – declare an error if the MODE field changes from what was
sent in the first segment, with an ASC of INVALID FIELD IN CDB;
b.	HP – MODE field changes for the last download for a download
sequence and this MODE determines the activation method – no error
generated for changes in the MODE field between segments; and
c.	 IBM – would be acceptable with “may terminate” with an ASC of
COMMAND SEQUENCE ERROR;
2)	On the MODE SPECIFIC field in different segments:
a.	 Seagate – Capture the MODE SPECIFIC on the first download with
MODE 0Dh and error if it changes;
b.	HP – did not address this issue; and
c.	 IBM – use the value in the last segment and ignore the value in
other segments with no error generated.
There are some significant differences in this list where one implementation
generates an error where another would have problems with an error being
generated. Is there some middle ground that would allow application clients
to know how a device server will respond?
Thanks for any input,
Bill Martin
SSD I/O Standards
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cell (408) 499-1839



More information about the T10 mailing list